It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation
Considering the importance of health and environment in humans' lives, I disagree with this notion that it is more critical for governments to spend money to ameliorate Internet access rather than improve public transportation. The reasons to support my viewpoint are elaborated on in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, public transportation improvement significantly affect humans' health. To be more specific, nowadays, a copious amount of people use their personal vehicle since they do not access to modern public transportation system. It is no secret to anyone that gasses such CO2, NOx, to name but two which have been produced by cars have negative impacts on people' health. Additionally, when people breath these kinds of gases, there are exposed to various diseases such as lung cancer. On the contrary, if governments spend more money on public transportation on make people aware of the benefits of them, individuals will utilize public transportation rather than their personal cars. In this regard, not only can they save their time since they do not need waste their times on traffic, but also they can breath more fresh air.
Moreover, by being an effective public transportation system in every society, governments are able to gain some revenue. To put it other words, governments are seeking to find a practical way to fulfill their budgets deficiencies. In this regard, numerous governments are assign extra taxes on some products but this method are not feasible in most of the cases. Therefore, modern countries are trying to use more efficient ways such as improving public transportation to encourage people to use them to gain money and countries' budget. Consequently, governments not only are able to gain their expenses for public transportation but also can save money to spend on other issues such as society welfare projects or providing fast Internet connection for society. Thus, it can be easily concluded that spending more money on public transportation can have more positive impacts than improving Internet access.
In conclusion, contemplating all the reasons and points, I do believe that public transportation concern is very vital for every society, so governments should consider the importance and benefits of that in humans' lives. Not only can public transportation affect humans' health, but also they can help governments to gain money and income.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TOEFL T P O 46 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow students or co workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o ameliorate Internet access rather than improve public transportation. The reaso...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rated on in the following paragraphs. To begin with, public transportation imp...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 771, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to waste'?
Suggestion: to waste
... save their time since they do not need waste their times on traffic, but also they c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: BREATHE_BREATH[1]
Message: Did you mean 'breathe'? 'breath' is a noun.
Suggestion: breathe
...eir times on traffic, but also they can breath more fresh air. Moreover, by ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...also they can breath more fresh air. Moreover, by being an effective public t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...herefore, modern countries are trying to use more efficient ways such as improvin...
^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dget. Consequently, governments not only are able to gain their expenses for publ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33421052632 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0035931852 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2194155632 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6875 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477643042929 0.236089414692 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159360098029 0.076458572812 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14909729352 0.0737576698707 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322588298342 0.150856017488 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102588606185 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.