Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that fast and easy movement, especially in big and populous cities, became a big problem. Most people believe that improving public transportation would be the best solution to this problem. Therefore, I, to a great extent disagree with this idea that it is important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
First and foremost, public transportation is a city infrastructure which influenced the living condition of more proportion of the population. For example, factory workers who have formed high per cent of each society, would not highly benefit from better Internet access. However, more appropriate transportation facilities could provide more welfare for them. Attention to this dominant portion of society is important because they pay an equal amount of taxes and tolls similar to people in upper-level jobs. So, it would be fairer to spend money on public transportation.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that today the problem of traffic and air pollution is a very serious issue in big cities. All people in society suffer equally from it. Nonetheless, until now city managers could not find a better and more effective solution for this concern than increasing and improving public transportation. When people have had access to an accessible, low cost and comfortable transporting facilities, they become more willing to use them. In this way, we will have fewer cars on highways and lesser air pollution.
Finally, yet importantly, some people believe that improving Internet access would create a lot of related jobs which can give proper economical progress and happiness for people. Contrary to this view, it is clear that investment in public transportation can also create several job opportunities, especially for construction and high-tech companies. In addition, we must not ignore the threaten of air pollution for human health and its harmful environmental effects.
On the basis of the reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that governments should spend more money on improving public transportation than Internet access. Because of the threatening of air pollution, and providing a better living condition for all people in the country.
- smart cars 81
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 90
- TPO 41 80
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 75
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...t of related jobs which can give proper economical progress and happiness for people. Cont...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...panies. In addition, we must not ignore the threaten of air pollution for human health and i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, for example, in addition, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45682451253 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07880980894 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548746518106 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8485505076 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.833333333 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477686417046 0.236089414692 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141049110437 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162924753469 0.0737576698707 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293344106471 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120636337996 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.