Is it more important to have talent or hard work? Explain by connecting your answer to your own personal experience.
In today’s world variety of skills and features are important for gaining peoples goals and improvement of their life. Like Tomas Edison said that the success is one per cent of the talent and ninety-nine of hard work. I strongly believe in that opinion. I will broad some reason to support my point of view.
To begin with, most people tend to look for easiest ways for pursuing their aims, but it is usually the opposite situation in which person should work harder and spend more time on their goals. This is the explanation why we do not have many successful people in different fields, it’s laziness. Some famous people or enough successful in their work are the most determined and hard-working ones. Let’s take a look at Elon Mask he spends most of his time working across the country working harder than anyone on our planet. His companies are famous and successful in rocket and electric car building.
My personal experience illustrates that if you work hard toward something you want you will get into tat field. I always wanted to find my calling and it happened when I was in medical college. I got triggered with the science and knew that in the end I will become scientist. This year I have graduated from the master’s degree and applying to the Ph. D. program in the best place of our country. I passed some exams and waiting for the results. Even if I won’t get into the program this year I will work in the lab and get more skills to try again. I am sure that hard work is the key for achieving anything you really want. People can have talent but be lazy or afraid of failure, so they choose something easy. One of my groupmates is pretty talented but lazy so he will stay in the local university instead of trying into the better program to get more capabilities to conduct research in better environments with the strong facilities. That is clear example of having the talent but not moving further, stock in the poor scientific environment. Without brave effort you will not improve your life.
Additionally, it is obvious even foe children to develop their skills they need to work on them even if they are talented, in drawing for example. Kids should learn all that art technics and spend hours to improve their talent. If they stop, they won’t achieve greatness in the art.
In conclusion, I would like to emphasize that hard work always pays off in the way you could not even have imagined. Talent is just a small part of success. Talented doctors for examples are people who spent half of their life studying and training their skills. All aforementioned examples provide strong evidence for my opinion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-06 | alicegreen13 | 70 | view |
- Which way would you like to change to improve your health: the kind of food you eat，or the amount of exercise，the mount of stress 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People can t be happy with what they have they always want something new or different Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which ONE of the following three actions is MOST useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community? Why?- Plant trees and create 76
- A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (ages14-18) improve their teaching. It is considering two plans:1. Choose a small group of excellent teachers; these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to 70
- Should children spend most of the time playing and studying or they should be required to help the family with household chores, like cooking and cleaning 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, really, so, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67451820128 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46335150513 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535331905782 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9234011624 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9642857143 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6785714286 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.45110844103 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20514623563 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474499527302 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409272449463 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101887381252 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435599530275 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.