It is more important to use your own knowledge and experience than ask others for knowledge and experience to solve problems. Do you agree or disagree?
With regard to the topic about how to save a tough nut through experience and knowledge, opinions from the public are clearly divided, with part of society claiming the method of solving problems via others' knowledge and experience. Yet this view is flawed and not convincing enough due to several reasons, and meanwhile the idea that our own knowledge and experience will come into play should be more supported.
To start with, used as the most reliable means, one's own knowledge and experience are likely to solve problems under any circumstances. That is to say, obstacles that people who are baffled by the factors of time and location render them tough to offer prompt and appropriate assistance although they are eager to. Such is the example for my brother, who is an overseas university student in America. For the jet lag between America and China, it is less possible to provide me with his assistance most of the time because he has to inevitably rest. This is because when I do my homework at night, he has to take his lessons in the morning. It is irresponsible to consider that they are unwilling to help them just for their lack of time. Therefore, most of the time, people should deal with obstacles with their wisdom.
In addition, personal experience and knowledge are better applicable to figuring out the problem-solving process. Although others' knowledge and experience of others may be both efficient and beneficial, the methods are not likely to suit us. In other words, the advice given is competent but not practical and cannot be fulfilled. For example, once I dealt with a math problem in primary school. Our teachers tend to see our solutions utilized subjunctive method, while my brothers could only figure it out by equations so that I can not master this method. Therefore, although given a relatively efficient way to solve the problem, I still cannot figure out the solution because it is beyond the scope which I acknowledge.
Nevertheless, opponents constantly claim the method of solving problems via others' knowledge and experience and attempt to rationalize their viewpoints by citing the argument that others have relatively ample knowledge and experience, which is conducive to solving problems. Nonetheless, this can be a one-sided judgment since in most cases, sophisticated people learn to solve problems by themselves. Because people who have offered help actively may be dissatisfied and unwilling to help if they are troubled frequently. Therefore, it is more rational to state that our own knowledge and experience will come into play.
In a nutshell, it is more vital to use your own knowledge and experience than ask others for knowledge and experience to solve problems.
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Transnational marriage has brought more benefits than drawbacks. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To be a successful person one must open up to new ideas and willing to change his or her mind 80
- Modern agriculture methods damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 76
- Transnational marriage has brought more benefits than drawbacks. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: NUT_NOT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not'?
Suggestion: not
... to the topic about how to save a tough nut through experience and knowledge, opini...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for example, in addition, in most cases, in other words, to start with, with regard to, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05777777778 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83990610173 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3360497117 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.95 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395216025601 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125656824449 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15428311552 0.0737576698707 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293169623784 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189563241636 0.0645574589148 294% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.