It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration.
Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
During human's history, There have been endless efforts to travel outside of their area for finding new worlds. It seems to human's naturarity. And also many people have been dreaming to go space travel for many reasons. But, I think it is not the first issue which need to spend money.
There are many childs who are suffering from starving everyday and struggle to avoid death, especially, in Africa. I think that Government should spend money for them, firstly. For space exploration, Government must spend a lots of money for developing spaceships, educating pilots, and launching spaceships. With that money, Government can save many life who are died, because they don't have enough money for buying some foods. Some people will disagree with my opinon, because countries which have been trying to launch their own spaceships usually don't have food problems. But, they should recognize that the countries who have been trying to go to space, also had tried enlarging their territories on the earth, and that somewhat affect the starving problems.(+13분)
Some people may insist that the environment of the earth has been going bad. So, condition of our planet would not suit for living. But, in my opinion, it will be more effective that we should spend our money and our energy about reasearch to purifying the earth. We need to focus on our home where we are living in. It is more important than wasting much money for space travel which is really non-economic thing.
Those two reason were why I disagree with spending a lots of money for space travel. We can use that money for more valuable things. If we spend the money for space travel. We wouldn't get anything from that. But If we spend the money for facing problems. It will be much more useful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun childs seems to be countable; consider using: 'many '.
Suggestion: many
...e which need to spend money. There are many childs who are suffering from starving everyda...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... childs who are suffering from starving everyday and struggle to avoid death, especially...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...pace exploration, Government must spend a lots of money for developing spaceships, edu...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...s. With that money, Government can save many life who are died, because they dont ha...
^^^^
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun life seems to be countable; consider using: 'many lives'.
Suggestion: many lives
...s. With that money, Government can save many life who are died, because they dont have en...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ve many life who are died, because they dont have enough money for buying some foods...
^^^^
Line 2, column 551, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... to launch their own spaceships usually dont have food problems. But, they should re...
^^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...eason were why I disagree with spending a lots of money for space travel. We can use t...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...we spend the money for space travel. We wouldnt get anything from that. But If we spend...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, really, so, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83443708609 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38986610999 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529801324503 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.820135256 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246360358899 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924099389949 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956827195188 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162147584903 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368460396016 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.