Nowadays, Space exploration and travel is of paramount importance for the advancement of science and scientific research. These researches and explorations in the past have led to some significant contributions which directly impacts life present on earth. Some erudite believe that space expedition and space exploration squanders public money but I contend that funding in the field of space technology is not a waste of money. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my point.
In recent years, a lot has been explored and discovered in space like new planets, asteroids, comets, discovery of ice and water in other planets, etc. The discoveries of water and suitable atmosphere in other planets will have a great impact and benefit for future of humanity and life on Earth. Researches have shown that climatic changes on earth will impact future generations of life on earth and may lead to complete decimation of humanity. So, the best possible way to save humanity is by migrating to a planet with suitable atmosphere which can be made possible by continuous investment and funding by government.
Although, there are no frequent threats caused by outer space to earth but there have some past incidents where a large asteroid struck the surface of Earth causing destruction to large areas. For example, in around 2012, an asteroid strike on Russia released massive amount of energy on earth and caused great destruction but no casualties were reported as it stuck on distant area. Investing in space technology and exploration have made it possible to reduce large asteroid strike by predicting their path and if they have probability to hit earth they can be deviated or broken into small pieces by missile technology.
The last and an important reason for exploring is to identify any kind of impact created by alien life if any present in outer space which may directly or indirectly impact humans. For these reasons, governments are continuously funding for artificial satellites and other machines for exploring planet Mars.
In conclusion, there might be myriad of factors and disadvantages for not allowing to fund space exploration but I strongly believe that advantages of funding space technology and exploration outnumber those disadvantages.
- Superpower food -integrated food 42
- Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a met 70
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in 86
- Superpower food -integrated food 3
- Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline.One hypothesis 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...cts life present on earth. Some erudite believe that space expedition and space explora...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her machines for exploring planet Mars. In conclusion, there might be myriad of ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'funding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: funding
...tors and disadvantages for not allowing to fund space exploration but I strongly believ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26997245179 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89650524869 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523415977961 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.719305971 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.642857143 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210525562387 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816944366282 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897872851273 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140538774052 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751320812343 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.