TLPs
The lecture and the reading passage both discussed about the causes of transient lunar phenomena, which is also known as TLPs. In the lecture, however, the professor casts doubt on hypotheses about cause of TLPs, which are described in the reading.
First, the lecturer argues that it seems gas is not the factor of occuring TLPs while the reading indicates that gathering of moon's gas are one of the reason that affect the phenomena. To be more particular, the sites where TLPs occured were far from where gas clouded and even gas is gathered, amounts of gas is too small to make phenomena.
Morover, in contrast to the claim in the reading that reflected light from dust causes the TLPs, the professor insists it is hard to see that small paritcles are the phenomena because there are no indication that dust and TLPs are related. Furthermore, according to the researcher who visited Moon, it is hard to find dust in the lunar atmosphere.
Finally, according to the passage, activities from the Sun can affect making TLPs. However, the lecturer maintains that the claim about relationship of solar flare and Moon's phenomena is based on the insufficient data. In additon, from the results of data, period of solar cycle and Moon's activities are occasionally match.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-10 | Minje Choi | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 317, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'matched'.
Suggestion: matched
...e and Moons activities are occasionally match.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 43.0788530466 23% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 1977.66487455 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 214.0 407.700716846 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95794392523 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.48103885553 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59126791425 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 212.727598566 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 618.680645161 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.6003584229 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0891670524 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.571428571 100.406767564 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5714285714 20.6045352989 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 5.45110844103 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 11.8709677419 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298818304041 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139711727399 0.076458572812 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102202433696 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1884919833 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053863855655 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.