Knowledge is an important part of our life. Some people prefer having deep knowledge about one particular subject, while others prefer having widespread knowledge about a variety of subjects. Which do you prefer and why?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Make sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
Nowadays, possessing knowledge is one way of surviving. Not having any sort of knowledge in a field is a great disadvantage and would easily be surpassed by those who possess knowledge. In a similar aspect, I believe that it is better to have widespread knowledge in a variety of fields than being well-acknowledged in a certain area. The reason to why I believe this way will be elaborated in more detail below.
First of all, as time passed, the importance of collaboration increased. Studies that are conducted these days are extremely complex and require people from various studies to come together. I would like to mention creating robots as an example. Robots are an intricate device which is created through collaboration of those who are an expert in robotics, computer science, mathematics, and even designers. Having knowledge in only the field they are an expert in would lead to miscommunication and would have spend immense amount of time in understanding each other. However, if they had at least a certain amount of knowledge in each other's field, then less miscommunications would occur, and they would be able to finish the project in a relatively short amount of time.
Moreover, companies nowadays tend to hire those who are well-acknowledged to multiple fields. In the case of software companies, an ideal employee would require knowledge not only in software developing, but also in psychology and even finance. Implementing a novel program is not a significant importance anymore. Companies these days focus more on developing programs that are easy to use in a wide range of people and should also be cost-effective. Being an expert in only one of the fields mentioned above, they wouldn't meet the requirements and would not be able achieve the job offered in the company.
Last but not least, having widespread knowledge in various fields is a great advantage for an individual in the sense of protection and saving money. For instance, unprecedented happenings could occur such as being attacked. If an individual have knowledge in law even if they are an expert in other fields, such as knowing the importance in acquiring evidences, in the case mentioned above, evidences would indicate photos of bruises, then this would help them in punishing the attacker and achieve justice. However, if they had no knowledge, then they wouldn't receive justice to what they had to go through. Similarly, many people hire experts in finance, who are extremely costly, in inhibiting the possible ways of money being leaked, but if one had knowledge in finance, they would easily be able to preserve their profit without the help from experts.
To sum up, while some might claim that having deep knowledge in a particular subject is better, having knowledge in various subjects is much better because it helps multiple experts in effective communication when collaborating and is a great advantage for individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-07 | Cookiedough | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-27 | edsonsimoes | 70 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | lucky123456 | 88 | view |
| 2021-03-21 | Umairpharmd1 | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-12 | luckystar1941 | 82 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice for a client Most homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last heating season that regi 69
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing games together is a good way to build closer relationships Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 73
- Critics say that current voting systems used in the United States are inefficient and often lead to the inaccurate counting of votes Miscounts can be especially damaging if an election is closely contested Those critics would like the traditional systems 73
- The following appeared in a memo from New Ventures Consulting to the president of HobCo Inc a chain of hobby shops Our team has completed its research on suitable building sites for a new HobCo hobby Shop in the city of Grilldon We discovered that there a 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...lead to miscommunication and would have spend immense amount of time in understanding...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 655, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun miscommunications is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...of knowledge in each others field, then less miscommunications would occur, and they...
^^^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...one of the fields mentioned above, they wouldnt meet the requirements and would not be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 554, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...er, if they had no knowledge, then they wouldnt receive justice to what they had to go ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, well, while, at least, for instance, sort of, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2451.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10625 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02184681275 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.846588694 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228403982665 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717648760833 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643438766753 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151916371957 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625681470345 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.