Leader like John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King have made important contributions to the people of the United State. Name another world leader you think is important. Given specific reasons for your choice.
One of the most substantial positions in any community, in particular in every country, is leadership. The consequences of a world leader’s decisions can lead his or her country, even the world, to prosperity or failures. Given my familiarity with the leaders of countries around the world, I can hold that Mir-Hossein Mousavi, captured leader of the Green Movement in Iran, is a great leader as a result of his efficient management techniques as well as his struggles for the revival of rights of the Iranian.
His presidential period coincided with the Iran-Iraq war. Iraq’s invasion of Iran resulted in the prolonged war and eroded both countries. Iran was in a critical strait, since no sooner had it experienced a revolution than the war started. Internationally and pragmatically experienced governors are sadly absent at that time, and they are fledgling, with the result that they virtually did not make right strategic decisions. However, Mir-Hossein Mousavi was the one who was able to manage the economy with a number of efficacious management techniques. His measurements gave rise to prevent or at least decrease the rate of ever-increasing inflation. For instance, he set a quota of essential commodities such as a specific amount of rice, meat, petroleum, and so forth; then, he allocated this amount to each person in this country so that much of their vital needs were satisfied in a low-cost manner. By doing so, dealers’ interference in the economy that could lead to both severe famine and inflation diminished. Despite the fact that present-day detractors of such a method dismiss it as an obsolete method, its efficiency at that time is indisputable, as it protected people, especially the poverty-stricken, from an extreme shortage of edible merchandises. Another way to show the superiority of his management techniques in such a difficult situation is to make a comparison between his presidential period in which was at the same time with one of the longest war in the world and the period in which oil price reached its zenith, but Iranian people witnessed sky-high prices while the country was in relative peace.
After his presidential period, he never took governmental responsibilities and positions for about twenty years because of significant discord over primal governmental principals between him and other governors, specifically the second Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei. Nonetheless, owing to the advent of unprecedented corruption and hypocrisy among governors, he decided to nominate himself as president again for the sake of Iran and its people. His nomination and sharp criticisms made people awake and created hopes for fundamental reformations among people. He dauntlessly pointed out both the corruption and the statistical manipulation of the preview government competing again for the next presidential period. These circumstances led to the Green Movement and resulted in the greatest political participation after Iran’s revolution. His absolute triumph notwithstanding, the election result was otherwise. There was a great amount of evidence denoting immense election fraud in the election. Unlike the other defeated candidates, he expressed his objections to election manipulation, wanted to hold the election again, and wanted to capture persons responsible for the fraud. Nevertheless, eventually, not only were the objections, protests, and demonstrations were suppressed, but Mir-Hossein Mousavi was also captured. Although he has been house arrested for ten years, he has never retreated and expressed contrition, but rather highlighted the vote right as the necessary human right and reproached the politicians who have been neutral about these democratically destructive circumstances.
In conclusion, I hail Mir-Hossein Mousavi as an influential leader due to his proper management techniques as well as his courage to announce the truth and insist on it. I wish he would release sometime, and there would be dignitaries like him in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 885, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a low-cost manner" with adverb for "low-cost"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...uch of their vital needs were satisfied in a low-cost manner. By doing so, dealers’ interference in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, then, well, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3408.0 1977.66487455 172% => OK
No of words: 623.0 407.700716846 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47030497592 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.99599519102 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27254608901 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 340.0 212.727598566 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545746388443 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 1076.4 618.680645161 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.5634622455 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.32 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.92 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0987504411634 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252016531981 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376215152318 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732758622832 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046860596184 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 198.0 86.8835125448 228% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.