Leaders like John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King have made important contributions to the people of the United States. Name another world leader you think is important. Give specific reasons for your choice.
William Lyon Mackenzie King was a member of the Canadian parliament and head of the Liberal Party in the first
half of the twentieth century. He held the office of prime minister for a total of twenty-one years, which is a longer period of
time than that of any public servant in the history of Canada. Because his terms of office as prime minister were not
consecutive, he held other positions of public service in many appointed and elected offices as well over a period of fifty
years. Although it could be argued that he was an important world leader on the basis of longevity alone, I admire him
because of his qualities of leadership. He was active in government during two world wars and the Great Depression and
played a key role in guiding Canada during those very difficult years. He understood the importance of a unified nation
and worked to bring various partisan groups together for the higher good of the country. Under his tenure in office,
Canada became a participant in world affairs.
His three terms of office as prime minister were marked by compromise and often criticism, but he earned the
respect of most Canadians for his political astuteness and his determination to unify Canada. In part because of his
friendship with Wilfrid Laurier, he was able to preserve the unity between the French-speaking and English-speaking
provinces, a negotiation that must be considered his greatest achievement. One biographer, John Moir of the University
of Toronto, has identified a quality in King called "essential Canadianness." I understand this to mean that he was able to
understand and represent all of the people of Canada.
King's methods were frustrating to some, but he was able to extend Canadian autonomy and maintain unity while
acting within a difficult federal system. He did so for a very long time, even representing Canada in the international arena
in his elder years. In my view, William Lyon Mackenzie King IS worthy of being named in the company of John F. Kennedy
and Martin Luther King as a world leader who made an important contribution to humanity.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-07-13 | faezeh1376 | 70 | view |
2022-01-19 | shihabyaqob | 90 | view |
2022-01-19 | shihabyaqob | 70 | view |
2021-08-02 | ursula | 60 | view |
2021-08-02 | nida fatima | 70 | view |
- Your friend has decided to switch careers but isn t sure which to choose What advice would you give them Provide reasons and examples to support your response 60
- Leaders like John F Kennedy and Martin Luther King have made important contributions to the people of the United States Name another world leader you think is important Give specific reasons for your choice 90
- Leaders like John F Kennedy and Martin Luther King have made important contributions to the people of the United States Name another world leader you think is important Give specific reasons for your choice 70
- Statement of Purpose for University Applications
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cademy, she job-shadowed. She sat in on some of the classes first, to see if she was intere...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, look, so, then, while, for instance, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 82.0 43.0788530466 190% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35454545455 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43033514677 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470454545455 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3500921481 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0909090909 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31818181818 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114889221129 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432054549431 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521584336593 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836245825933 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00962293058061 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 58.1214874552 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cademy, she job-shadowed. She sat in on some of the classes first, to see if she was intere...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, look, so, then, while, for instance, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 82.0 43.0788530466 190% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35454545455 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43033514677 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470454545455 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3500921481 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0909090909 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31818181818 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114889221129 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432054549431 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521584336593 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836245825933 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00962293058061 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 58.1214874552 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.