leadership comes naturally, one cannot learn to be a leader.
There is lots of discussion these days about leadership and its importance in success of any team or nation. some people believe that leadership comes naturally and cannot be learnt, others believe that it is a talent that can be learnt. In my view leadership, like any other talent, can be learnt for two reasons.
First, scientists have proved that most of human capabilties are learnt and only a small percentage comes naturally. Recently, I read a paper in a well known magazine, regarding the impact of environment and teachings is a person's talents. In research claims that 20% of any person's talents come naturally, but 80% is acquired from different parameters like their living environment, family, friends, school and their day to day experiences. So, leadership like other talents can be learnt.
Secondly, having good models around helps people learn from them. For example in a family that a leader persona already exists, the other have more potentional of becomming leaders, because they can learn from that persona. As sample you can see most of the good kings came in one series, since a king that is a good leader teaches leading to their offsprings too. By considering this fact some may say that these threats are transfered to them genetically, but the fact is that since they were around leaders their whole life, so they have picked up their behavior and developed to be successful learders themselves. So having good models around helps to learn this talent and this has nothing to do with genetics. For example, I had a friend that was a very good leader in our company, I remember when I asked her about her abilities, she said her friend was the best leader around, and she had learnt all this from her.
In summary, although some people are naturally better leaders than others, but leading abilities can be learnt. Learning capability of humans has been proved in the mentioned article, and also there are a lot of sample leaders that have learned leading because they were around model leaders.
- TPO 45 3
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 80
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 71
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 73
- The world’s forests are facing increasing pressure which, if left unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implement useful conservation 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'There are lots'?
Suggestion: There are lots
There is lots of discussion these days about leadersh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...tance in success of any team or nation. some people believe that leadership comes na...
^^^^
Line 5, column 842, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[2]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'told'?
Suggestion: told
...en I asked her about her abilities, she said her friend was the best leader around, ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to lead'.
Suggestion: to lead
...lot of sample leaders that have learned leading because they were around model leaders....
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in summary, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89565217391 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54200750243 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544927536232 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6969834634 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287160730993 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908610447214 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546097861669 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16589500844 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317395737883 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.