Learning is the best to do
There are many different learning styles, and it is important that we look for classes that match our academic preferences. Personally, I believe that it is extremely beneficial to take classes which are very interactive. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, classes that include a lot of discussions develop our communication skills. Our long-term success depends on our ability to persuade others to accept our ideas and proposals, so it critically important to seize opportunities to talk to a variety of people. If we do not practice this skill, we will never develop it. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. About ten years ago, I enrolled in a history class. At that time I had already taken many classes at university, but I was still very shy around strangers. However, after nine months of participating in debates, discussions and presentations in that class I came out of my shell and became a very confident public speaker. As a result, when I began my career following my graduation I excelled in group work and was seen by my supervisors as a natural leader. For this reason, I was quickly promoted within my company. I have been very successful at my workplace, and I owe it all to that wonderful class.
Secondly, classes that are very interactive help us to form connections with our classmates, and these can lead to future opportunities. When we regularly converse with our peers, we get to know their personalities. Consequently, we can even become very close friends with them. In contrast, when students just sit and passively listen to their professor, they are unlikely to get to know each other. For instance, when my brother was in college he took an information technology class that required a lot of group work. He spent two months that semester working on a programming project with two other students and during that time they all became very close. In fact, a year later they felt comfortable enough to actually form a company together. It has been six years since they founded that business and it is still very profitable.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that it is a great idea to take classes where students actually talk to each other and their professor. This is because they help us develop valuable skills and abilities, and because they help us form important social connection
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-12 | Anurag96 | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | lucunxing | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | shayanhgh | 3 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | Pooja dave | 95 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- do you prefer building high school in you community or not 60
- tpo 36 integrated writing 52
- Dinosaurs were endotherms during the fossil period. 85
- Before tendering my opinion I guess I need to give quick glance on this argument on many sides. Some people trying to interrupt and correct the wrong issues immediately if the teacher said something wrong. But others wait until the class is over and then 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
There are many different learning styles, and it is important th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84671532847 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89169243551 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542579075426 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.536025013 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6086956522 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8695652174 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30434782609 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0251081190545 0.236089414692 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00803025772471 0.076458572812 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260271919475 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0181373694872 0.150856017488 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211037044603 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.