Some people believe that it is an important part of a child's education to go on field trips(such as museums). Others think that children should spend time learning in a classroom at school. Which view do you agree with?
With advancements in technology, various innovative methods are being developed to engage students in their studies. In this regard, some people believe that teachers should stick to the traditional method of teaching in a classroom, while others consider taking students outside into an external environment or making them take trips to educational sites like museums, etc. Personally, I find this to be a good idea. I would like to substantiate my viewpoint by providing two major reasons.
To begin with, the most crucial effect is that it makes children learn more effectively. When the students visit the educational sites, they will be able to grasp more knowledge as compared to their usual class lectures. Since it will be more exciting for them to venture on a trip, they will be more exhilarated and will learn more. On the contrary, in their classrooms, they get bored quite easily and feel monotonous while making notes and assignments. Moreover, they would be able to retain that information for a longer period of time since the special memory would be associated with it. My recent experience illustrates this point in a better way. When I went on my educational tour in Bengaluru, I visited the famous museum of insects at Tamil Nadu University. I can still recall most of their names and classes.
The second importance of organizing trips for students is that they will be able to take a break from their busy and boring schedule. They will be able to energize and revive themselves. In addition to this, they will be encountering various new people during their journey. This will improve their communication and help them socialize and make new friends.
In conclusion, I would reaffirm my viewpoint that it is more preferable to allow students to go on educational tours together. Children will get the opportunity to interact and be social; they will also get to know more and retain that information later in life. Therefore, due to the aforementioned advantages, I believe students should make trips to various educational sites.
- What do you think is most important to a lasting friendship The other party can help they have the same interests and worldviews about what matters they trust each other 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship 70
- If you have extra money are you happier giving it to charity or spending it yourself 70
- Cedar population 60
- It is sometimes better to hide truth or always remain honest 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...to retain that information for a longer period of time since the special memory would be assoc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86389498126 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538235294118 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6154183711 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3684210526 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124751118168 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397355679682 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470349688613 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852740551404 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350503140941 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.