A controversial debate which is often raised about the best source of information for learning. Some groups of people hold the view that learning by watching television provide good knowledge. However, the other groups may take an opposite point and believe that learning by reading a book or magazine is more appropriate. From my vantage point, I concur with the latter groups and believe that studying through the process of reading provide a solid ground for learning. In the following paragraph, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through three major reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that it is easier to find the peace of information from books. In fact, if I go to a library, I can easily find the topic I am looking for. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above is the navigation facilities which are available in libraries, such a facility can search for the right book from thousands of books that are available on the computer. A book about pharmacy , for instance, can be located instantly through the searching engine, giving exactly where could it be found, on what shelf, and in which raw.
The second reason which deserves some words here is that the search engine in the library is for free. In other words instead of paying money to have a special channel which broadcast the required information, we can rent or read books in the library at no cost. Therefore, such service is not only valuable, but affordable as well.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first ones which cross the mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle point which must be born in mind. The noteworthy refreshing intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent research conducted on group of students in my hometown have shown that significant number of people prefer to gather educational information through reading a book rather than watching television. The study was done among 120 higher education individuals from diverse fields inorder avoid bias.
To wrap up, contemplating all aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that educational learning through reading books provide more variety of learning techniques and are not costly.
- television has positive effect on our society 78
- Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline. 73
- using vessels as electric batteries in ancient times 73
- People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things, other people learn by reading about things, others learn by listening to people talk about things. Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your 73
- Both the lecture and the reading passage discuss the danger of glass on birds. While the reading state that there are many solutions to prevent injuries to birds. The lecture refutes this, by saying that these solutions not effective to prevent birds fro 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: PEACE_PIECE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'piece'?
Suggestion: piece
...tioned is that it is easier to find the peace of information from books. In fact, if ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e on the computer. A book about pharmacy , for instance, can be located instantly ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03743315508 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77266145708 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566844919786 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1379294954 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.823529412 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225780314281 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638848178081 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075886427431 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128525162957 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851262160248 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.