The proper use of money generated from tax payers is a priority for most governments. Tax payer's money could be spent on different projects to improve services provided for residents.Some governments prefer spending those money on internet services because it improves communication between people, others prefer allocating more budget to improve public transportation. while both sectors are important, I prefer allocating more budget to public transportation because it preserves the environment, it reduces traffic, and it saves people's time.
First, governments who spends money to improve public transportation creates cleaner environment. If governments spends money on public transportation instead of spending it on internet services, they provide fresh air to people. it is known the cars emit large amount of carbon dioxide to the air which is harmful to people, for example, I live in the city of Los Angeles, and there are around one three million cars in the streets each day. Better public transport services mean that people are going reduce the usage of their car. Thus, the quality of air will improve and people are able to breath fresh air.
Secondly spending the money on public transportation instead of spending it on internet will reduce traffic. People are spending lots of time on the street each day because of traffic. A better public transportation will allow people to park their cars and use buses or underground for transportation. thus, less cars will be on the streets, and as a result, residents can save time and be in their offices on time.
Finally, governments which spends more money on public transportation can help the economy. imagine the amount of gasoline that is imported each year and the amount of hard currency that is being exported. By enhancing the public transportation, people can save money, and the governments will decrease the amount of fuel which is being imported. Therefore, this spending is going to be offset by the reduction of fuel importation.
In conclusion, governments are able to benefit significantly from improving the public transportation system. With this approach the air quality will be better, less cars will be on the streets, and the economy will benefit in a positive way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...improve services provided for residents.Some governments prefer spending those money...
^^^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'those moneys', 'those monies'?
Suggestion: this money; those moneys; those monies
...idents.Some governments prefer spending those money on internet services because it improve...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...udget to improve public transportation. while both sectors are important, I prefer al...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ices, they provide fresh air to people. it is known the cars emit large amount of ...
^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...uses or underground for transportation. thus, less cars will be on the streets, and ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...r underground for transportation. thus, less cars will be on the streets, and as a r...
^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Imagine
...ic transportation can help the economy. imagine the amount of gasoline that is imported...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...pproach the air quality will be better, less cars will be on the streets, and the ec...
^^^^
Line 9, column 225, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e streets, and the economy will benefit in a positive way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25966850829 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99132879903 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453038674033 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3127664427 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.777777778 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232571665443 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897101775169 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074463783887 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142170431084 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047872134684 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.