Many cities have rules that teachers should not give the primary school 5 to 10 years old students no more than 30 minutes of homework every day because students have already gotten enough instructions during the day

Essay topics:

Many cities have rules that teachers should not give the primary school 5 to 10 years old students no more than 30 minutes of homework every day because students have already gotten enough instructions during the day.

Some people agree that cities should establish some regulations asking teachers not giving primary school students more than 30 minutes of homework every day, while others disagree with such policy. For me, I agree that cities should enact regulations that restrict educators from assigning too much assignment. My reasons are as follows.

To begin with, educators must focus on primary school students’ studying effectiveness, but assigning too much homework per day might severely affect students’ studying effectiveness. Take my friend, Todd, as an example. Todd was studying at Tsaotun Elementary School, Nantou City 15 years ago. At the same time, Nantou City enacted a regulation that disallowed elementary school teachers to assign more than 2 homework per school day. Therefore, Todd had 6 hours of free time from 4 p.m. to 10 p.m. every single day. Since Todd was an exceptionally hard-working student, he spent nearly four hours studying English, math, and science day by day. Eventually, he acquired A-pluses and As on every subject. On the contrary, my sister, Jane, lived in Taipei City, and there were no laws similar to the one mentioned in the statement in Taipei. Jane’s science teacher was extremely strict. That is, her teacher assigned weekly projects to them. She needed to spend more than an hour per day purchasing necessary science equipment, searching for experiment steps online, and writing project report. As a result, she did not have enough time to study other subjects like English and Mandarin. So even though she procured 95 points on her science report, Jane got C and D+ in English and Mandarin classes respectively.

In addition, instructors should be concerned about young students’ mental health. Nonetheless, without elementary assignment limiting regulations, students might become mentally unhealthy. For example, my brother’s city, Taipei, did not have any rules that regulate the amount of homework a teacher can give every day, so my brother’s math teacher usually assigned no less than 4 pages of math worksheet nearly every day. As a result, my brother frequently felt exhausted and unhappy after spending more than 2 hours per day completing his assignment. In the long run, his incessant despondence made him develop depression, and his constant fear of not being able to finish the homework on time made him get insomnia at a really young age. On the other hand, my nephew, Ken, moved to Hualien City with my uncle and aunt when he was 7 years old. Hualien City had elementary school assignment-related laws that limited the amount of homework a teacher can give, so Ken had no less than 7 hours of free time per day. He often played video games and board games with his friends after school. Hence, Ken felt content with his school life, and he did not have any mental health issues.

In conclusion, I maintain that cities should not give the primary school 5 to 10 years old students no more than 30 minutes of homework every day because the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-14 wxr031 81 view
2022-03-14 wxr031 85 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user wxr031 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2555.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74795851497 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.431665536 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2692307692 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408725930365 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10465795994 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118978601773 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327902711161 0.150856017488 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127622201385 0.0645574589148 198% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.