Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
Books and movies are based on different principles and both have different writers. Depending on that, both writers cannot interpret the story in the same direction. Both scripts would have major differences in their stories. If I have to choose from a novel based movie or original book, then I will choose a book. I will elaborate on my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs.
First, the most striking reason is books not limited to time and authors can relate the story with more details. Filmmakers must relate their story in a limited time, two or maximum three hours, while time is not a limitation for authors, and they can write their story in a book with thousands of pages or even in 2 or 3 volume. Therefore, filmmakers should neglect many details, while the author by enjoying their innovative mind and imagination can tell more details about the story and bring their readers into the role of the story’s characters. For example, I read all the series of Harry Potter, after that I watched the Harry Potter movie series, but I was so disappointed because the movie had little details. Further, sometimes because of the consequences movie cannot include all the details of the true story. For instance, recently I watched a movie story about the former prime minister of India. In that movie, few dialogs were censured because of the political conflicts. So, I decided to read a book which represented the whole true story of his life. This realized that reading books is better than watching movies.
Second, filmmakers like to use a bit of artistic license, and can sometimes change a storyline completely. This can be to suit the audience the film is being aimed at or just because they feel their interpretation is more appropriate. This changes the whole story of the real character. Moreover, a film is just one interpretation of a novel. If a novel has been read by a million people, then that means there are a million versions of that novel floating around in people's minds. Thus, it is extremely improbable that the filmmaker has the same interpretation as you, then only you can enjoy that movie.
Let’s put in a nutshell, as mentioned above reading books is more exciting. It gives freedom to imagine the whole story and broaden people’s horizons. I will prefer to read books rather than watching a movie based on the book.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs. First, the most striking reason is books...
^^^
Line 2, column 759, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consequences'' or 'consequence's'?
Suggestion: consequences'; consequence's
...ails. Further, sometimes because of the consequences movie cannot include all the details of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83703703704 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68717990335 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528395061728 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1649463168 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1739130435 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6086956522 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04347826087 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244379863158 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724821928687 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827075098936 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153024868184 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616772392989 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.