Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals like members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationship good? Why or why not? Use specific reason and examples to support your answer.
In recent times, there has been a widespread debate on whether people should treat pets as a part of their family members or not. Personally, I believe treating animals nicely has many benefits. I feel this way for a couple of reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, when people take care of pets, they will learn how to take care of their own kids. Obviously, treating animals is very similar to treating human being. Both of them require the same process of eating and cleaning. For example, my wife Rana had a cat her name is Luce since she was ten years old. She used to take care of Luce all the time by cleaning her and give her a daily shower. Moreover, she used to prepare the food for her every day. Later on, when Rana got married and got her first baby, she did not straggle with him because she learned how to take care of kids from <span style='display: inline !important; float: none; background-color: transparent; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: "Lucida Grande","Lucida Sans Unicode",helvetica,verdana,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 19.33px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 31.9px; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap; word-spacing: 0px;'>L</span>uce. Therefore, she was able to give her new baby the appropriate care by feeding and preparing the bath for him everyday. Furthermore, she learned how to play with kids from playing with Luce long time ago. On the other hand, if people did not have pets as a part of the family, they would not learn how to take care of their kids. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Since I was a child, I did not like pets at all and I used to treat them badly. Thus, when I became a father, I had many challenges with my kids. I did not know how to take care of them when my wife was not at home.
Adding to the previous point, when people treat animals well, they would learn how to be more kind and have some mercy with other individuals. Many studies showed that people who have pets have high level of kindness. They do not accept the concept of hurting other and they live safely in the world. The world with these kindness people will be perfect for living and there will not be any fighting between people and countries. That’s will be an ideal environments form for the global that we need.
In conclusion, I encourage individuals to take care of pets because they will get several advantageous from them.
- Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient. Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some people say that physical exercise should be a required part of every school day. Other people believe that students should spend the whole school day on academic studies. Which opinion do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to support yo 78
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historical buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- A friend of yours has received some money and plans to use all of it either to go on vacation or to buy a car. Your friend asked you for advice. Compare your friend’s two choice and explain which one you think your friend should choose. Use specific rea 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 738, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...; font-family: 'Lucida Grande','Lucida Sans Unicode',helvetica,ver...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 770, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , helvetica
...de','Lucida Sans Unicode',helvetica,verdana,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 19...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 788, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , arial
...ida Sans Unicode',helvetica,verdana,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 19.33px; font-st...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1220, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... feeding and preparing the bath for him everyday. Furthermore, she learned how to play w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'environment'?
Suggestion: environment
...countries. That's will be an ideal environments form for the global that we need. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill get several advantageous from them.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95671981777 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.78924848986 2.67179642975 142% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533029612756 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 117.988064502 48.9658058833 241% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 94.6086956522 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0869565217 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.60869565217 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159983857181 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540797761563 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554847987542 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974152625094 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590070633605 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.