Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
It is incredible how people`s life has changed withing the last one hundred years. In the modern world, the fast developing technology benefits people in their daily routine. This way, in contemporary society, people are able to spend less time on cooking and consume much healthier food than their ancestors. Therefore, in my view, the fact that food has become easier to prepare undoubtedly has reflected the improvement of people`s life.
First of all, these days, people have more time for enjoyable activities. For example, as my grandmother told me, back in the past, she has to devote hours to food preparation. She has to bake bread on her own for the whole family. She did not have special appliances to help her and this way, the process of the backing took her out of the family. Conversely, today, I can bake the bread for my loved ones by using modern technology. For me, it is fast and easy. So, I have enough time left to play with my children and enjoy their company. To that end, the technical progress let modern people contribute time to the thinks they like to do in the higher degree if compare with their ancestors.
Secondly, food has become healthier. Today, certain appliances are so advanced, that during the preparation, food saves all vitamins and important for humans components intact. For instance, I have a machine for cooking vegetables, the only thing I have to do is in the morning put the vegetables into the pan, lock it with the lead and set up with the certain temperature. After that, I can leave for work and when I come back home I am going to have delicious healthy vegetables are ready to consume. I use this pan all the time and my family loves it. By consuming the healthy food I have a lot of energy to move on with my life.
To conclude, I strongly believe that the change in food preparation is the pivotal advance for the modern humans. This is because nowadays, people are capable of spending more time on activities they truly enjoy and they have a chance to eat healthier. Here is no doubt that these benefits have increased people`s quality of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | Pandalove | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | prayashpathak | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | Emn96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | mike.sharko | 66 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | khosrow nouroozi | 70 | view |
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways, or on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons to develop your essay. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 44
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory. 60
- The widespread use of the Internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today’s world? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement New fathers should get a paid vacation from work when they have a baby 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 402, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...oday, I can bake the bread for my loved ones by using modern technology. For me, it ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, no doubt, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67379679144 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64180324159 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524064171123 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8048838836 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2380952381 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8095238095 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159289822425 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541067258193 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501000912026 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115128463505 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597153035972 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.