Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?
Human being expends a certain amount of time in order to prepare their food. Personally, I believe that individuals’ life has changed in many senses, especially in satisfactory ways. I feel this way for three main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, people have limited time to live and make necessary things. Individuals are capable of making supper in short extent of period. When we are able to spend less time on a preparation of meal, we can expend relatively more time on other significant matters such as learning and enjoying life. For example, before my mother purchase the new kitchen tools, she had been spending two hours for cooking every day. Now, she spends only thirty minutes on cooking thanks to expedient gadgets, which is the reason why she started reading science material for more time than she did before, and stating that this equipment facilitated her daily life. As a result, numerous busy people including my mommy can consume their time for more important things rather than cooking since an amount of time they spend for preparing supper is reduced.
Secondly, brand-new technologies are nearly so developed that it can adjust the temperature and time accurately when we cook food. Thereby, we are available to circumvent any risk of preparing the distasteful meal, which means that we will gorge delicious foods all the time, and will not put any meal to rubbish bin. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I am untalented man to boil rise, and I had overboiled it several times before I buy an automatic cooker. On the other hand, I can prepare tasty foods irrespective of my sense to cook because there are several automatic objects which spell it for me. Drawing from my own experience, loss of food and food with unpleasant taste is no longer a problem in today’s world, thanks to the developed technologies that help us.
Finally, Nowadays, Individuals are able to prepare the variety of sustenance since we can do whatever we want to eat, which suggests that they make different types of foods. The more divergent type of food we eat, the more vitamin our body will receive. Therefore, our body system and health are improved significantly, which is the important thing we always consider and worry about. In consequence, main worry of people, health problem, diminished because they can digest a variety of nutrition.
To sum up, novel accessible methods of cooking improves individuals’ life quality in three ways. They can save time, prepare delicious meals and eat the wide variety of sustenance because they spend less time on cooking, take advantage on automatic cookers and there are numerous cuisines of preparing foods respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, people have limited time ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 845, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... spend for preparing supper is reduced. Secondly, brand-new technologies are nea...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 794, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he developed technologies that help us. Finally, Nowadays, Individuals are able ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they can digest a variety of nutrition. To sum up, novel accessible methods of c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in short, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0327510917 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71378408384 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554585152838 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7734094698 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.761904762 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8095238095 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7619047619 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158359425517 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490535257943 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328314736141 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09760657359 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366231623603 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.