:Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that education is the powerful weapon that has revolutionized the world with many breakthroughs. Vividly there are different approaches to attain information and to gain knowledge in order to be successful. In this regard, many universities and high schools try to instill education in their students. Getting students involved in projects is of paramount importance. There are different schools of thought among students. Where some reckon that giving equal grades to every member of the group is right approach, others contemplate that providing equal grades to every member of the student group is injustice. As for this writer's opinion, I would champion to the notion that every member should not be given the same grade. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first reason corroborating my stanace is associated with the notion that when students are performing in a group for a project, there is different level of participation. Some students who are serious about their studies work strenously to achieve their goal, yet there are indolent students too who get benefit of their laziness because of others efforts. In my view, this is injustice. Moreover,students who spent day and night for their projects would be equivalent to ones who did not play anyshare. IT is notable that these characteristicsand traits are not efficient for their personality development.Obviously, when they will go into their practical life, they will encounter many arduous circumstances, if they sustain their same attitude, it leads them to be a failure.aby the way of illustration, Five years ago, My colleague and I was working in a group project, he did not participated in the project but yet he was able to got high grades in project .due to the reason that our professor decided to give same score to all group members. Temporarily, he got his ways, but last year, I heard that he was fired from his job because he was not a active participant in group and he did not expressed good good teamwork skills.My example certainly manifests importance of grading depending on participation.
The second rationale behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that there should be an alternate way to evaluate and score members of a group. To be more specific, if students are provided with the chance to appear in a written exam or oral viva after completion of their project, they would actively show their interest in the project and establish the skills that would lead them to be prosperous. For instance, if my colleague had known that his performance would be checked by viva, here would have worked hard
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that awarding the same grade to all the group members of a project is not correct way of evaluation. For the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating. First, not every member contributes equally for achieving the goal. Second, there should be any other way to evaluate students' performances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 670, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...student group is injustice. As for this writers opinion, I would champion to the notion...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , students
... In my view, this is injustice. Moreover,students who spent day and night for their proje...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 612, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Obviously
...cient for their personality development.Obviously, when they will go into their practical...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 890, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'participate'
Suggestion: participate
... working in a group project, he did not participated in the project but yet he was able to g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 967, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e was able to got high grades in project .due to the reason that our professor dec...
^^
Line 2, column 1158, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s fired from his job because he was not a active participant in group and he did ...
^
Line 2, column 1203, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'express'
Suggestion: express
...ive participant in group and he did not expressed good good teamwork skills.My example ce...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1213, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: good
...ipant in group and he did not expressed good good teamwork skills.My example certainly ma...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1239, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: My
...not expressed good good teamwork skills.My example certainly manifests importance ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, as for, for instance, by and large, by the way, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2548.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0157480315 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00524218042 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505905511811 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.717401922 48.9658058833 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 127.4 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344781009488 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931947902322 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08855356263 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227942178264 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763850308877 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.