The most important forcing students to work as a team is to teach them how to improve their soft skills such as teamwork, leadership, communication skills, and so on. A great team consists of different people with different abilities and different tasks to do. The amazing variety of teammates most leads them to brainstorm better practical ideas and cover others’ weaknesses, but what happens when someone is not sticking to the plan? In this case, there must be different outputs for every student and they should not be considered equal. So I completely disagree with giving all of them the same scores.
To begin with, most of the time the responsibilities of all the members of the team are not the same, and rating everyone the same grade is not fair. Imagine the most powerful person who handles the hardest part of the job and tries to be the glue guy, and help everyone to have better socialization, and then there is the lazy one who frequently blunders in the team and is an actual disaster to the team. When we consider both strong one and lazy one the same we just going to destroy the value of hardworking ruthlessly and this means even the best hardworking member who is now starting to believe there is no justice in scores, is going to lose their momentum, and this is going to put an end to the original cause of creating a unified team.
Furthermore, this type of rating increases the chance of cheating of fraud students who do not take their job seriously by thinking that they will get the same grades as others anyway. There is always that rebel, outlaw student who never respects the rights of their teammates. as soon as he finds out about the rating manner, they are going to find an illegal way to run from the rules and cheat. In this case, even others are going to be extremely angry because they feel abused and soon they are going to be tired of this outrageous situation and ask for punishment of the guilty person. So what happens when they face this injustice approach of grading? They will lose their faith in trusting, which causes them to lose their hope for working hard and communicating honestly in future projects.
In conclusion, this irrational approach is not a good idea at all. Not only is it unfair because of the different members’ responsibilities, but also it can lead to more unreal grades for fraud students who cheat in their projects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...respects the rights of their teammates. as soon as he finds out about the rating m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, furthermore, honestly, if, so, then, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65094339623 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5734796014 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514150943396 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8199789404 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13356075227 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541711794901 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571451126471 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896390153135 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176121819619 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.