Nowadays, many job interviewers and employers are looking for various additional sources of information to better understand a job application. Which is the best way for the employers to better know the situation of a job application?
- Contacting previous employers the job application worked for and asking for further information
- Checking the job applicants’ profiles on social platforms (such as social networking websites and social media)
- Letting the job applicant work for the company for a short period of time (1-month) and then decide whether to hire the applicant permanently
In modern society, with the popularity of social media and social networking, it is easier for job interviewers to glean more information about their job applicants. At this time, a general controversy arises. Some people believe checking the profiles of the applicants is the most efficient way to grasp a clear picture of them, while others hold a different belief that we had better get in touch with their previous workmates to evaluate their situations. As far as I am concerned, I hardly concur with these two ideas, and I believe letting the applicant work in the real workplace should be viewed as a superior option.
In the first place, working in a real environment can help job interviewers have a more comprehensive understanding of the job applicant in terms of his real abilities. As we all know, possessing the ability to put what has been learned into practice is critical not only for employees but also for companies. Companies treasure employees who can make profits for them instead of workers who only memorize the dull equations and theories listed in the textbooks. Sometimes the nerds who can succeed in exams and have a perfect GPA on their resume cannot do a good job in real workplaces. If the job applicant is granted the chance to show himself, the job interviewer can point out his merits and weaknesses with ease, which actually is a time-saving behavior in the long term. For example, last year I had a short period of internship at an Internet magnate. During that time, I performed well, and my bosses had lots of opportunities to evaluate my competence, ranging from speaking skills to math and programming skills. My leader was very satisfied. And finally, I got an offer that enables me to work there for a longer time.
In addition, it is also of vital importance for the interviewers to figure out whether the job hunters are suitable for the working group. Our society values cooperation and everyone is interrelated just like different components of an engine. So, the interviewers should ensure that the right person goes into the right group according to their personality and characteristics. Whether the job applicant can understand the company culture and get accustomed to the working atmosphere or not? Whether he can work with other colleagues harmoniously without triggering some quarrels or not? Only through letting him have an opportunity to work in that workplace, can these questions be answered.
Admittedly, we can also obtain some valuable and manifold information about the job hunters from other channels, such as their previous coworkers and their social media such as LinkedIn, a pervasive career platform used by people all over the world. But we have to be aware of the deficiencies of the information that we get from those methods. They may be biased, leading us to get discriminatory impressions of the applicants. And when evaluating one person, we need a fairer method in order to avoid missing some real talents.
In a nutshell, working in a company is the best way for job interviewers to judge applicants. In this way, not only can the advantages and disadvantages in practice be fully checked, but also the fitness between applicants and the organization can be taken into consideration in an efficient way.
- Out of the following three things which one would you prefer to regulate in order to improve your health the kind of food you eat the amount of exercise the amount of stress in your life 80
- Should the most important education for students be conducted in the classroom, but not out of the classroom? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how well their students perform. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: the ability to write well is more important than that of speaking? 76
- A lot of people today develop additional skills during their free time Some people prefer to develop complementary skills that are related to and may enhance their full time jobs Others prefer to develop skills that are not related to their jobs such as s 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 277, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ization can be taken into consideration in an efficient way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2746.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 549.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00182149362 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96318442044 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52276867031 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 856.8 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4646086923 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.84 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.96 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257934139233 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707953290909 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770105607847 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149840992012 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555358822886 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.