In modern society, with the popularity of social media and social networking, it is easier for job interviewers to glean more infomation about their job applicants. At this time, a general controversy arises. Some people believe checking the profiles of the applicants is the most efficient way to grasp a clear picture of them, while others hold a different belief that we had better get in touch with their previous workmates to evaluate their situations. As far as I am concerned, I hardly concur with these two ideas, and I believe letting the applicant work in the real workplace should be viewed as a superior option.
In the first place, working in the real environment can help job interviewers have a more comprehensive understanding of the job applicant in terms of his real abilities. As we all know, possessing the ability to put what have been learned in to practice is cirtical not only for employees but also for companies. Companies treasure employees who can make profits to them instead of workers who only remember the dull equations and theories listed on the textbooks. Sometimes the nerds who can succeed in exams and have a perfect GPA on their resume cannot do a good job in real workplaces. If the job applicant is granted the chance to show himself, the job interviewer can point out the merits and disadvantages of him with ease, which actually is a time-saving behavior in the long term. For example, last year I had an short period of internship in a Internet magnate. During that time, I performed well, and my bosses had lots of opportunities to evaluate my compentence, ranging from speaking skills to math and programming skills. My leader was very satisfied. And fininally, I got the offer that enables me to work there for a longer time.
In addition, it is also of vital improtance for the interviewers to figure out whether the job hunters are suitable for the working group. Our society values cooperation and everyone is interralated just like different components of an engine. So the intervewers should attach great importance to ensure that the right person go into the right group according to their personality and characteristics. Whether the job applicant can understand the company culture and get accustomed to the working atmosphere or not? Whether he can work with other colleagues harmoniously without triggering some quarrels or not? Only through letting him have an opportunity to work in that workplace, can these questions be answered.
Admittedly, we can also obtain some valuable and manifold information about the job hunters from other channels, such as their previous coworkers and their social media such as LinkedIn, a pervasive career platform used by people all over the world. But we have to be aware of the deficiencies of those information that we get from those methods. They may be biased, leading us get discriminatory impressions of the applicants and outcomes. And when evaluate one person, we need a more fair method in order to avoid missing some real talents.
In a nutshell, working in the company is the best way for job interviewers to judge the applicants. Through this way, not only can the advantages and disadvantages in practice be fully checked, but also the fitness between applicants and the organization can be taken into consideration in an effecient way.
- A lot of people today develop additional skills during their free time Some people prefer to develop complementary skills that are related to and may enhance their full time jobs Others prefer to develop skills that are not related to their jobs such as s 83
- Are parents the best teachers Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents are the best teachers Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement People often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern days parents can learn more from their children than children can learn from their parents 83
- A lot of people today develop additional skills during their free time Some people prefer to develop complementary skills that are related to and may enhance their full time jobs Others prefer to develop skills that are not related to their jobs such as s 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir situations. As far as I am concerned, I hardly concur with these two ideas, an...
^^
Line 3, column 821, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...long term. For example, last year I had an short period of internship in a Interne...
^^
Line 3, column 854, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... I had an short period of internship in a Internet magnate. During that time, I p...
^
Line 7, column 298, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...have to be aware of the deficiencies of those information that we get from those methods. They ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2797.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 559.0 407.700716846 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00357781753 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86242540663 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95936987862 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 212.727598566 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520572450805 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 873.9 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8407731528 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.88 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.36 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252635770455 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697608593933 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760651202059 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146766924817 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469755207213 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.