Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
I think that the sedentary lifestyle of the modern world has been impacting humans since the inception of technology. Sustainability of resources has now become a prime focus of most of the scientists to assuage the harm caused by the current lifestyle of humans to our planet. I agree with the statement that our future generations will suffer because of our present way of living. I will explore three reasons for my stance in the following essay.
To begin with, the industrial revolution helped us in the mass production of goods. We started consuming these materials, however, we became complacent because the labour required to do a particular task reduced drastically. The information technology revolution was another hammer stroke on our world, which made us even smugger leaving us in a world where we cannot even have body movement. For example, I went to play with my friends on the cricket ground every day in my childhood. But, children today are sitting in their rooms all day long and playing video games with their friends on the internet. The physical and mental development of kids happens in the real world and not virtual reality.
- Internet is a platform with enormous power. It can help us buy our goods without stepping outside of our homes. E-commerce such as Amazon, eBay, Alibaba is the companies that deliver goods at our doorstep can now be seen as locked in our houses. The technological applications are great, but we have forgotten that we do have a real world. Our next generation will not know what it means to go to a shop and buy mundane stuff. For example, my cousin, aged four, has not seen her mother going out to get food and clothes. When I asked her, "Let's go to buy some milk products," she would bring her mother's mobile phone rather than get ready to go out.
Finally, we have become overdependent on the technology, that if it collapses one day, then we are not ready to tackle the consequences of the crash. Our bodies have now evolved to sit all day long at the same place. It costs our health, so we can imagine how it could affect the next generations who will never know what suffering and efforts look like. For example, the next generation would be weak, and they won't resist any physical exertion.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that our bad style of living will affect our next generations in a way that we will regret. This is because of kids' lesser physical and mental development, a sedentary lifestyle where kids would have never experienced the outside world and where children will be physically weak.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-20 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | ishitakush.08 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | GRACE_047 | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | rassata | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | rassata | 73 | view |
- The outermost layer of skin the epidermis produces a variety of growths in animal and bird species Because dinosaurs were reptiles and modern reptiles have scales and armor plates on their skin it was long assumed that dinosaurs had the same type of skin 90
- In twenty year there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 53
- In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today 80
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... 'Lets go to buy some milk products,' she would bring her mothers mobile pho...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, so, then, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78747203579 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67510191967 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548098434004 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.58902148 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0434782609 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4347826087 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4347826087 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264490968472 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723263258493 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849412051099 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161614412952 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826868094993 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.