Parents should express their disapproval towards the teachers of their children when the parents do not agree with the way the teachers are teaching
The past few decades have witnessed the increasing importance of education in our society. So nowadays, parents are really concerned about the way their children are studying. In this regard, some people believe that it is important to raise objections to the way teachers teach students if they are wrong, while others are inclined to think that teachers should be given the right to decide the way of teaching. Nevertheless, this controversy still remains heavily debated. Personally, I concur with the former opinion that parents should express their disagreement if they do not feel the teaching method of a teacher is right for their children. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the reasons and examples to substantiate my point.
First, if parents will make teachers aware of the flaws in their teaching style, then this will allow teachers to rectify their mistakes. Furthermore, it is more likely that teachers will deeply analyze their way of teaching and will try to overcome the problems, consequently improving their style of teaching. My recent experience is a good case in point. One of my course teachers, Miss Ria, used to deliver lectures on individual subject topics. She never ever held interactive sessions with us or any kind of class activity; as a result, my mother met her and suggested involving students in class assignments and activities, and surprisingly, she implemented my mother’s advice. Now our class is no longer a passive listening class; instead, we enjoy and learn a lot.
Second, by telling teachers to change their way of teaching, parents can do a lot of good for children and their future. Since it is ultimately the students who will suffer in the end if their teacher continues to teach them in the wrong way, they will not develop an interest in their studies. On top of that, the teachers will be unsuccessful in playing the part for which they are striving or being paid. Hence, both students and teachers will be at a loss.
In conclusion, I would like to reaffirm my viewpoint that parents should not hesitate to point out the flaws in the way of teaching mentors. To recapitulate, pointing out objections on the teaching styles of teachers will allow them to review their style and at the end, it will be advantageous for both students as well as the teachers themselves. Therefore, due to the aforementioned reasons, I feel this way.
- Friend influence the students more than their teachers 76
- Cedar population 60
- It is sometimes better to hide truth or always remain honest 73
- Is the ability to read and write more important today than in the past Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Declining population of cedar tree species 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... will be advantageous for both students as well as the teachers themselves. Therefore, due...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9504950495 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80384257458 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529702970297 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4221431856 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.263157895 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84210526316 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419836456685 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133471665522 0.076458572812 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140563684559 0.0737576698707 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289203296523 0.150856017488 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728709105886 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.