People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. DO you agree or disagree?
Happiness is of the greatest importance in human beings lives. Some people are of the opinion that happiness mostly gain from people's social life. However, personally speaking, it is my firm conviction that happiness gain more from their jobs due to some reasons. I will elaborate upon the momentous reasons in the following paragraphs.
The first point worth mentioning would be that people spend most of their time in their workplace which can affect their happiness whether positively or negatively. It is crystal-clear that human beings in order to make a living have to work. I am of the opinion that people who have enjoyable time in their work place can gain more happiness in general. A prime example of my father can shade some light on this point. Working as a teacher, he really likes his work place inasmuch as not only does he spend a substantial amount of time with people whom he likes, but also he enjoys teaching to children. Having a desirable job, he has gained enough happiness in his life. Deeming, were he not interested in his job, he would not be as happy as he is now. In a word, people spend significant amount of their time in their workplace which can influence their feeling significantly.
There is also a more subtle point we must consider. The more money people create, the further happiness they would gain. It goes without saying that a great many people strongly believe the money is the key to happiness. Having a well-paid job, people would enjoy a high-quality lifestyle. The poor people suffering from financial problems do not live a delight full life. In contrast, people in well-paid jobs such as doctors, lawyers, university teachers live a quite comfortable life and they earning a good living. According to resent research, conducted by Isfahan University of Technology, many people in low-income families have to confront lost of hurdle in their life which do not let them to have jun and enjoyable moments. Hence, people who have not been able to carve a niche for themselves in society and their income do not stretch to their expenses do not enjoy a happy living.
In the final analyse, according to above-mentioned points and examples, it is a forgeon conclusion that people gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life since they expend substantial amount of their time in their workplace. Besides, the money which they make through their jobs can determine the level of their happiness. As a result, people whose jobs have not lived up their expectation cannot consider as happy people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Nurmira | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | Harutyun Aslanyan | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Nurmira | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | farzaddanaei | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | farzaddanaei | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree? It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older? 73
- It is better to use your own knowledge and experience to solve problem than to ask other people for advise? Do you agree or disagree? 70
- TPO46 80
- TPO45 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, really, so, well, in contrast, in general, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90322580645 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64543825522 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486175115207 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3848703549 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5217391304 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8695652174 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78260869565 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491898284038 0.236089414692 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155340506226 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122766924104 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356060709111 0.150856017488 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881210310496 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.