People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
It’s hard to deny that people may develop multiple and exhilarating careers if they have many different skills, and such a fact may mislead impressionable people to generate the opinions that they will be more successful than people who focus on only one skill. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as expertise, salary and career are concerned, I strongly hold that people who focus on one skill only can develop a more successful career.
First and foremost, expert geniuses are in great need by the society. According to the policies released by Chinese government, innovative geniuses in certain field are welcomed by the companies. If we focus on any of those geniuses, we can easily find out that they are all expert in their own field and few of them have further achievement in other academic areas. People who have outstanding achievement usually don’t have spare time on other things which indicates that people with multiple skills are usually not sophisticated. To say the least, even though they are skillful, they will probably have no space to show their skills.
In addition to that, average salary, as one of the basic elements to judge if someone is successful, is higher than people who do multiple jobs according to the researches done by Harvard. Let’s consider what reason can lead to this fact? It’s an unarguable fact that professionals always earn more than amateurs. Since people with multiple skills are more likely to be amateurs according to the second paragraph, they unsurprisingly earn less. We can straightforwardly reach the conclusion that people with only one expert skill are more inclined to succeed. The spirit of craftsmanship is a typical example of studying something to the extreme and finally succeeding.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that people with multiple skills can have relatively more wonderful career because they can experience different living styles. However, such a statement has a fatal flaw that it deliberately neglects the occupation stability. In Chinese culture, people always long for and pursue the life stability. Different living styles seem to be romantic while it is some kind fragile.
In a nutshell, I maintain my idea that people who focus on one skill only are more likely to succeed. Admittedly, as my favourite quote from James Madison goes, as long as the reason of man continues fallible, different opinions will be formed, and some people may oppose me. However, I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 73
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their study of field is 73
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their study of field is 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...e and exhilarating careers if they have many different skills, and such a fact may mislead imp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15566037736 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81070336389 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521226415094 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5998043299 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.095238095 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1904761905 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468375121606 0.236089414692 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12805749878 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160667569891 0.0737576698707 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270808457693 0.150856017488 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147296369609 0.0645574589148 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...e and exhilarating careers if they have many different skills, and such a fact may mislead imp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15566037736 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81070336389 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521226415094 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5998043299 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.095238095 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1904761905 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468375121606 0.236089414692 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12805749878 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160667569891 0.0737576698707 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270808457693 0.150856017488 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147296369609 0.0645574589148 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.