Printed books have more effect on society than the TV.
We are living in a complex age which facilities have a profound impact on people's lives. Although some people believe that printed books have more effect on people than TV, I firmly concur the idea that TV bring people more beneficial consequences than the printed book. There are some reasons, the most important of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
First of all, it is undoubted that the TV provides much more opportunities for people learn myriad of sources, while the book teach you one subject. As a matter of fact, there are a lot of channels on the TV which enables people to see different programs. To illustrate this fact, one needs only refer to numerous people prefer to watch TV due to having plenty of programs in the various fields. Seldom do people read a book with different subject. Although the book can have reliable sources, but governments check what are shown in TV to increase the level of program. The noteworthy intelligible results, which conducted in our country, show that the numerous people who do not have enough time to read book and they prefer to watch TV.
The second reason why I agree with it is that, obviously, TV make people to have strengthen and cordial relationship. In fact, TV program allows people to spend their time with each other. The modern world offers abundant examples of people who are able to speak about their problem with family member to find a great solution to solve their problem. Take a personal experience as an example, there was a time that I was deciding to go overseas university. Since my family always gather to watch TV every night, I could ask their opinion about my decision and finally I had decided to apply for university abroad. Had TV not gathered my family to watch the TV, I would have not mad a great decision. AS a result, the more family use the TV, the more they would be aware about family member situations.
To make a long story short, no one can deny the enormous positive effect of TV on society especially families. Not only are they able to increase their knowledge readily, but also they can make an intimate family. For this reason, I highly recommend that governments force channels to produce more efficient and effective programs to bring people several lucrative consequences such what mentioned above.
- the most important problems of today's world can be solved in our lifetime 73
- in modern world we should never be impolite to another person 94
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and 71
- Students are more interested in politics now than they were in the past 82
- some people believe that the media (for example: television, radio, newspapers, or Internet newssources) are less concerned nowadays with presenting accurate facts than they were in the past. Thesepeople argue that the media today often present incorrect 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'strengthened'.
Suggestion: strengthened
...that, obviously, TV make people to have strengthen and cordial relationship. In fact, TV p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, so, then, while, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77419354839 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52563774123 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518610421836 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1331362276 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.263157895 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367742739366 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105628311659 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115098521223 0.0737576698707 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22430258983 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104662255035 0.0645574589148 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.