Q: A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
School a second home to a child, someone has to learn many thing at school. For this teacher should have ability to get along with the student, needs to understand the focus of the student so that student will understand well as well as have the acute understanding of the subject so student can learn quickly. Generally speaking, I disagree with teacher needs to have ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
First of all, student need get best possible and concise knowledge about the subject in easy way. Such is only possible if the teacher has excellent knowledge of the subject being taught not only getting along with the student. One can one give what he/she possesses. That's why teacher as well give acute, praises knowledge if the teacher is also well acknowledge of it. For example I had a math teacher in high school and was greatly acknowledge about the subject. He was boring in person, never get along with the student but the ease with he thought in best understandable way, I got a great understanding on math and pretty good on it.
In addition to the knowledge of the teacher about the subject, student are sent to school to learn, to secure knowledge not to only get along with the teacher. We have to have clear understanding; Why student are sent to school or the main purpose behind student been sent to school? It's simple gain knowledge and only a teacher with excellent knowledge of the subject can give that. For instance, a friend of mine who use to study at "A" high school was happy first, he used to say that his science teacher is great and he is getting along with him quite good. Now he realizes that his science teacher lacks precise knowledge about the topic and now he is encountering difficulty to catch up with high school science.
By way of conclusion, based on the argument presented above, teacher with excellent knowledge give meticulous ideas and great knowledge about the subject. It is nice getting along with the teacher which helps to expand student knowledge beyond text as well but it's more important that teacher possesses excellent knowledge of subject being taught so that student can get best and acute knowledge about the topic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | anasemad11 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | anasemad11 | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | oscar21 | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | SERDARKOCAK | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | NidhiKalani | 3 | view |
- Some people believe that social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter have a negative impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships Others believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way 61
- Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computersor television or of studying at traditional schools.Which would you prefer? Use reasons and specific details to explain your choice. 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 73
- Q: A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
...d home to a child, someone has to learn many thing at school. For this teacher should have...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'well as'.
Suggestion: well as
...student so that student will understand well as well as have the acute understanding of the sub...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'get the best'.
Suggestion: get the best
...ing taught. First of all, student need get best possible and concise knowledge about th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...One can one give what he/she possesses. Thats why teacher as well give acute, praises...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 435, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'acknowledged'.
Suggestion: acknowledged
... teacher in high school and was greatly acknowledge about the subject. He was boring in per...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 553, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...he student but the ease with he thought in best understandable way, I got a great under...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...hat. For instance, a friend of mine who use to study at 'A' high school w...
^^^
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...text as well but its more important that teacher possesses excellent knowledge of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5215439893 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6054389763 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506509565516 0.236089414692 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199725572691 0.076458572812 261% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18040748942 0.0737576698707 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.364561629854 0.150856017488 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993141696907 0.0645574589148 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.