Read and think about the following statement:
Pets should be treated like family members.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons to support your opinion.
Although the argument has been made that money spent on pets could better be directed to programs that provide assistance for needy people, I agree that pets should be treated like family members because they live in our homes and interact with us like family members do. Often parents allow children to have pets in order to teach them to be responsible. By feeding, walking, and grooming a dog, children learn to be dependable and kind. Parents expect their children to take care of the pets as if they were members of the family in order to learn these valuable lessons. For many children, a dog or a kitten is also a best friend and a wonderful way to learn how to treat a new brother or sister when the family expands.
Besides the friendship that children enjoy with animals, pets can substitute for the absence of other family members. Sometimes a couple who is unable to have children will adopt pets and treat them like babies. They shower the love on their cats that they might have provided a child, and receive affection and companionship in return. Many people who are living alone enjoy the companionship of a pet instead of loved ones who are at a distance or have passed away. The pet becomes a family member for these people and deserves the same kind of treatment that a family member would receive.
Many articles have appeared in the popular press citing the benefits of pets to the disabled and the elderly. In addition to the usual services that pets may provide, such as bringing objects to their owners or helping a vision-impaired owner to walk in unfamiliar surroundings, there is evidence that pets actually extend the life expectancy of their owners. In a real sense, these pets are caring for their owners like family members would, and for this reason, they should be treated like family.
At every stage in life we interact with our pets in the same ways that we interact with family. Children,young married couples, and elderly people have reason to treat their pets like family members.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-05 | prakan4 | 66 | view |
| 2018-11-05 | prakan4 | 66 | view |
| 2018-11-05 | prakan4 | 66 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | Anand Parinam | 70 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | Anand Parinam | 76 | view |
- Read and think about the following statement:Pets should be treated like family members.Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons to support your opinion. 70
- advances in transportation and communication like the airplane and telephone have changed the way nations interact in global society.choose another innovation that you think is important 90
- young people have more enjoyment in life than older people 80
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 90
- Read and think about the following statement:Pets should be treated like family members.Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons to support your opinion. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 621, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...any children, a dog or a kitten is also a best friend and a wonderful way to lear...
^
Line 6, column 105, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , young
...s that we interact with family. Children,young married couples, and elderly people hav...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, if, may, so, in addition, kind of, such as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74787535411 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45417028611 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507082152975 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.440143047 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.733333333 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228101845923 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858585127617 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705704996632 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15622782598 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277914483569 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.