Since when we were young, our parents emphasized the importance of reading books. Fiction is for developing creativity and non-fiction is for fostering the knowledge of children. However, some parents mandate children to read non-fiction books because they believe that fiction is not good for them. However, I disagree with this claim and ardently assert that we should not force children on what to read for two reasons.
First, fiction tells stories of characters that cultivate literary knowledge and teach children moral lessons. Although fantasy may be incorporated in the story to boost the imagination of children, the personalities of characters and outcomes of the plot are all similar to reality. For instance, "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee encompasses a series of events that are seen through a six-year-old girl. However, its real message is about the exploration of moral questions, social inequality, and prejudice. Symbolism helps the readers think about the previous topics, asking whether humans are fundamentally good or evil. With such novels, children can rethink their actions and society. If the children are to face the same information in non-fiction books, they will face the extreme difficulty of having to analyze reports and psychological explanations of documents.
Second, fiction does not just deal with stories; factual knowledge has to be incorporated to analyze the work. When looking at the novel "Around the World in Eighty Days" by Jules Verne, the main protagonist visits parts of the world as a bet in his club. The reader can gain information about the international date line and culture of the visited countries while in progress. Like so, several novels require background knowledge of various topics to proceed further into the plot, and children can consequently gain related information. Just because fictions contain stories of imaginary characters, it does not mean it confines children in the fictional world.
Because of these two reasons, I strongly disagree with the idea of forcing non-fiction books to children. Although the two areas are different in the type of content, it is indisputable that they all deepen the insights of the world. We have to let children swim freely in the ocean of imagination.
- TOEFL integrated writing Altruism
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 65
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 65
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinio 46
- TOEFL integrated writing Altruism 48
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, while, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37950138504 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97439341947 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581717451524 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2575752591 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.210526316 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45603272058 0.236089414692 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132034183731 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122739435821 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276000440525 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138853125914 0.0645574589148 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, while, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37950138504 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97439341947 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581717451524 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2575752591 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.210526316 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45603272058 0.236089414692 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132034183731 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122739435821 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276000440525 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138853125914 0.0645574589148 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.