The reading passage and lecture are both disccusing how humpback whales navigate during migration The author claims three evidences that humpback used stars for navigation The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article He mentions non of these evid

Essay topics:

The reading passage and lecture are both disccusing how humpback whales navigate during migration. The author claims three evidences that humpback used stars for navigation. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. He mentions non of these evidences is convenience.
First, passage elaborates on inteligence of this type of whales. He says, these wales have brain with dgree of comlexity enable them to use stars for navigation. The lecturer contradicts this idea. He states, ther is no relationship between the inteligent and size of brain with navigation. many small birds like duck migrate and use stars as navigation. Therefore there is no connection between size of brain and using stars for migration
Second, the writer argues, wales migrate in a straight line. Movenent in straight direction mean that these animals use external subjects like stars to keep movement in that direction. The orofessor refutes this argument. He says, the wales use magnatic field from ground thatb helpe them to navigate rather than stars.
Finally, the author mentions that wlaes have a spesific behavior called spy- hopping. This behavoir is found only in animal that migrate by using stars as navigation. The professor in the other hand states, many animals have this bahavior like shark. He claim, shark floading straight up and their haed above but they do not migrate. This explain that spy -hopping is not correct idea that prove whlaes might use stars as navigation.

The reading passage and lecture are both disccusing how humpback whales navigate during migration. The author claims three evidences that humpback used stars for navigation. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. He mentions non of these evidences is convenience.
First, passage elaborates on inteligence of this type of whales. He says, these wales have brain with dgree of comlexity enable them to use stars for navigation. The lecturer contradicts this idea. He states, ther is no relationship between the inteligent and size of brain with navigation. many small birds like duck migrate and use stars as navigation. Therefore there is no connection between size of brain and using stars for migration
Second, the writer argues, wales migrate in a straight line. Movenent in straight direction mean that these animals use external subjects like stars to keep movement in that direction. The orofessor refutes this argument. He says, the wales use magnatic field from ground thatb helpe them to navigate rather than stars.
Finally, the author mentions that wlaes have a spesific behavior called spy- hopping. This behavoir is found only in animal that migrate by using stars as navigation. The professor in the other hand states, many animals have this bahavior like shark. He claim, shark floading straight up and their haed above but they do not migrate. This explain that spy -hopping is not correct idea that prove whlaes might use stars as navigation.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-10 talelaldabous 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture are both...
^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hat humpback used stars for navigation. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in t...
^^^
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...gent and size of brain with navigation. many small birds like duck migrate and use s...
^^^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ck migrate and use stars as navigation. Therefore there is no connection between size of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of brain and using stars for migration Second, the writer argues, wales migrate...
^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ht direction mean that these animals use external subjects like stars to keep mov...
^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
...imals have this bahavior like shark. He claim, shark floading straight up and their h...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, so, therefore

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 239.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19246861925 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51963456151 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585774058577 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9560943244 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.9444444444 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2777777778 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.45110844103 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412728974538 0.236089414692 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131132610247 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13882945888 0.0737576698707 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30219537975 0.150856017488 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.318053558609 0.0645574589148 493% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.93 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.