The sale of tobacco should be banned Agree or disagree Why or why not Discuss your position 365 words

Tobacco industry is one of the biggest industries for decades. Because, many individual around the world demand those products for various applications. I disagree with the idea of banning tobaccos as a non-smoker and I would like to express the base of my idea in the following lines.
First of all, the plants that are used to produce tobaccos have been growing for a very long time in different parts of the earth and these plants are in use since then via several methods. From the first ages of the human history, it is known that people used to smoke many types of tobaccos and some of those were used in medicine, therapy and healing. I also strictly support the statement that if a creature grows or lives on earth, then there must be a reason to benefit them. Here, the important point is to determine our aim and application way.
Secondly, we need to consider that today, many people use tobacco to have fun and relax. There are many people who would like to use them voluntarily in daily routine even at work. Furthermore, almost every single person know the harms of these products however they still love to use them eagerly. But it is not our responsibility to stop or ban them since every human being are free to make their own decision and get away with the consequences. Of course, it is an undeniable fact that there are terrible side effects or threads of those products and I believe that consuming too much of any product would harm our body or maybe cause fatal illnesses. But, in my point of view, a tobacco user should have known that and must be aware of the possible results. Therefore, it is urgent to know your body, the ingredients and possible effects of the product, your usage purpose and the amount of usage of the product.
I could only agree with the state that people mustn't use tobaccos in public , common or closed areas since the fume effects everyone in the place and personally I wouldn't want to be a passive smoker. Also, the smell after smoke is unbearable for a guy who doesn't smoke at all. Moreover, there must be an age limit to buy these products because, there are many curious teens and children. In order to protect their health and life style, sales must ask for an ID.
To sum up, I think adult people should be able to reach any kind tobacco from stores unless they wouldn't limit non-smokers and young generations habitat.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: mustn't
...d only agree with the state that people mustnt use tobaccos in public , common or clos...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hat people mustnt use tobaccos in public , common or closed areas since the fume e...
^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... everyone in the place and personally I wouldnt want to be a passive smoker. Also, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...after smoke is unbearable for a guy who doesnt smoke at all. Moreover, there must be a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ny kind tobacco from stores unless they wouldnt limit non-smokers and young generations...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...hey wouldnt limit non-smokers and young generations habitat.
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, i think, of course, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57845433255 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37695150618 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543325526932 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7106451407 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.894736842 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4736842105 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132565674486 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394102672968 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355511064763 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076311273429 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171681047146 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.