Atending school is one of the most important things we do in our life. The quality of our studies and the level of our edjucation usully determines our job and career. Some people believe students should be asked to evaluate their teachers. Some disagree. In my view in order to improve the quality of teachers, they should be evaluated by students for two important reasons.
First, it will prevent waste of time in classrooms. Using time efficently is one of the main objectives that every good teacher should have, and it really affects the quality of edjucation. If the teachers know that they one of the things that they will be evaluated for, is the amount of time management, they will try to not waste time in classrooms. For example, I remmember when I was in high school, the teachers were not evaluated by anyone, so some of the teachers used to spend half of the class telling jokes or speaking about something irrelevent to the topic of the course. This can harm students in lots of ways. For instance, our chemestry teacher did not finish the course materials that he was suppose to teach in my last year of high school because of lack of time management, and as a result me and my other classmates did not learn some of the most important parts of our book. As a result me and my classmates did not do good in the national university entrence exam, which is the most important and most competetive exam students take in their educational lifetime in Iran. I believe if the teachers, were being monitored, the teachers would have finished the courses on time, and we would have been more seccesful.
Second, it can motivate the teachers to teach better. Generally speaking we would do better in our work if we know that we will be evaluated for what we do. This applies to the teachers too. I believe if teachers know that the students will grade them too, they will try to improve their quality of their teaching. For example, when I was in university of tehran, at the end of the year the teachers were evaluated by students. I remmeber, one teacher had a were bad handwriting so students gave bad points on that matter. In the other semmester, I had another course with him, and I saw a great improvment in his handwriting. This experiment thought me that if the teachers be evaluated, they will try to improve and avoid their mistakes.
In sum, I believe it is very benefitial to evaluate the teachers. Not only do they will improve their quality of their teaching but they also will avoid wasting time.
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 73
- Nuclear EnergyThe 20th century saw the use of fossil fuels such as coal, gas, and oil as the predominant sources of energy for our society. But, with their use have come a number of serious problems, such as their limited availability and the question of 73
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good neighbor? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 60
- Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are 92
- Endangered Species Many environmentalists support the current system of laws that works to save all species that may become extinct. They claim that the current variety of organisms that exist on Earth must be preserved. This idea has long been held as o 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...achers were not evaluated by anyone, so some of the teachers used to spend half of the clas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'supposed'.
Suggestion: supposed
...finish the course materials that he was suppose to teach in my last year of high school...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'for example', 'for instance', 'speaking about', 'as a result', 'in my view']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.215291750503 0.229887763892 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.171026156942 0.158761421928 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0543259557344 0.0866891130778 63% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0362173038229 0.046263068375 78% => OK
Pronouns: 0.1046277666 0.0685040099705 153% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.136820925553 0.118717715034 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0342052313883 0.0351676179071 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56337127944 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0221327967807 0.0309702414327 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0885311871227 0.0887237588012 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0342052313883 0.0209618222197 163% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010060362173 0.0139019557991 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2527.0 2387.08602151 106% => OK
No of words: 451.0 408.028673835 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60310421286 5.86048508987 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.292682926829 0.338922669872 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.250554323725 0.251872472559 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.172949002217 0.174417080927 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108647450111 0.112833075102 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56337127944 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427937915743 0.524397521467 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.9940427624 59.2087087015 79% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6684587814 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.6086956522 20.5533526081 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8139497478 48.84282405 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.869565217 120.699889404 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6086956522 20.5533526081 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.521739130435 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 44.6641280247 45.7405998639 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.23870967742 1.45489161554 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163155993181 0.300154397459 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113789242709 0.103427244359 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0900923355821 0.0752933317313 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.463803754039 0.497263757937 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.1517130816 0.151897553556 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814730300115 0.114077575197 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622601085255 0.0781384742642 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.493686654321 0.336927656856 147% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.103178651864 0.067059652881 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146917210418 0.210909579961 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341740260017 0.0618886996521 55% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.86379928315 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.