People always debate whether a government should spend the more money on improving the roads and highways or improving public transportation. From my perspective, a government should be spent the more money on improving public transportation because of the following reason.
First, the traffic problem is the major concern of any cities which can be removed by improving the public transportation due to the fact that a person uses the public service if the service has the good feature and facilities. For example, in India, the major cities Delhi, Mumbai have the excellent roads but do not have enough public buses. As a result, people drive their own private car and the traffic problem becomes serious. If the government purchases the more money on improving the public transportation, then the cities did not have such problem. Thus, the government should spend more money on improving public transportation.
Next, pollution can minimize by using the public transportation even though a city has the great population. People do not buy the private car and the least number of vehicles certainly do not produce the too much detrimental gases. For instance, the capital city of Nepal- Kathmandu is suffered from the pollution like overcrowding, noise, dust, excess Co2, etc. When the government enhanced the public transportation, nowadays the pollution rate is going to decrease. In addition, from the hospital report, today, the disease of respiration is low in Kathmandu. Hence, the pollution can be minimized by improving the public transportation and any government should purchase on that.
Further, on spending the more money on public transportation can take the benefits by all kinds of people. The public transportation is a part and parcel to all of the people even he/she be the high profile person. Let us take my example, I had a luxurious car but one day the car’s tire punched and did not work. I must be gone to attain an important meeting and I did not have the time to rent another car. Thus I used the public bus even I was the secretary of an influencing organization. Therefore, we all take the benefits of public transportation and a government should spend more money.
In conclusion, a government should spend more money on public transportation because the traffic problem can remove, pollution can be minimized and all people take the benefits.
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved theway people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Governments should pay more on computer technology or basic needs? 68
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Which do you prefer use specific reason to develop your essay. 60
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 73
- In many parts of the world and throughout history government have moved their capitals Discuss the potential problems and benefits Say whether you would be in favor of moving your capital 21
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Mumbai) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...n India, the major cities Delhi, Mumbai have the excellent roads but do not have eno...
^^^^
Line 8, column 158, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... transportation is a part and parcel to all of the people even he/she be the high profile ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 188, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...parcel to all of the people even he/she be the high profile person. Let us take my...
^^
Line 8, column 415, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... not have the time to rent another car. Thus I used the public bus even I was the se...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.0752688172 372% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13554987212 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02682585668 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455242966752 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2437588127 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.55 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410834774044 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158404092533 0.076458572812 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168766994669 0.0737576698707 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290787119153 0.150856017488 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136787395125 0.0645574589148 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.