Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Government always tries to seek the best for their country, they are usually in a situation where they have priorities to be achieved. Their decisions have a huge impact on almost every aspect of our lives. Government should spend more money on improving public transportation compare to spending on improving road and highways. I will elaborate my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs.
First, public transportation can reduce traffic problem which is faced by most of the countries. Traffic is a big issue and it is the main cause of the air pollution. Nowadays, governments prefer that people share their rides with others. For example, in the USA there are different lanes for people who are not traveling alone. Moreover, air pollution is hazardous to people’s health. More cars on road creates more exhaust poisonous gases. I am a physical therapist and I read many articles about athletes training. I was surprised when I read an article that people who are running on the streets get exposed to highly dangerous gases that comes from car exhaust, and unfortunately, could lead to serious respiratory diseases.
Secondly, most public transportation systems do not receive enough funding. Governments don’t invest heavily enough and thus the system tends to be very inconvenient and out dated. Few buses result in poor service and the buses are often old and uncomfortable. Not only do buses suffer from lack of investment, but all other forms of public transportation such as trains and subways do as well. Outdated transportation is also the reason that people prefer private vehicle. If the public transportation is good, then people with low income can easily travel to any places.
Let’s put in a nutshell, governments should pay particular attention to public transportation because not only it will help to reduce pollution, but also brings convenience for citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-15 | wty980711 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Orwell1984 | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | mohammadkmi | 81 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | mohammadkmi | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | marysv | 73 | view |
- If you could go back to some time and place to live with less pollution would you want to go 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising can tell you a lot about a country. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Summarize points made in the lecture and how it cast doubt pints made in the reading passage.On February 15th, 1898, the USS Moline Sank of the coast of Havana, Cuba. More than two hundred and officers on board died as a result of an explosion, which many 3
- Often, we are required to participate in group projects at school or work. Sometimes we must work with the people who share our opinions and ideas However, sometimes we must work with the people who have completely different opinions than us. Which option 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement that women should get the same payment if taking the same task as men Use specific reasons and examples to explain your opinion 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lead to serious respiratory diseases. Secondly, most public transportation sys...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25986842105 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9940192433 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2664677212 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1578947368 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260850756513 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732721863755 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146171939438 0.0737576698707 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156602899971 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105696271387 0.0645574589148 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.