Should Teacher of the Year awards be decided through student evaluations of teachers, or through evaluations by other teachers? Please explain.
class="MsoNormal">class="when">when class="it">it comes to the question on teachers’ performance evaluation, some people might point out class="that">that evaluations by class="other">other teachers are more professional based on their teaching experiences. However, I agree class="that">that class="it">it’s more useful to evaluate teachers’ performances by students for reasons having to class="do">do with the improvement of education quality and the protection of evaluation equality.
class="MsoNormal">
class="MsoNormal">The most critical class="reason">reason lies in the improvement of education quality. class="it">it class="is">is the class="student">student who class="can">can class="give">give feedbacks to teachers directly because students are the main participants in the class="classroom">classroom. For example, students’ feedbacks contribute to the implementation of new teaching facilities class="like">like VR, flipped class="classroom">classroom or something class="like">like class="that">that. furthermore, they class="also">also contribute to the revision of the teaching syllabus and the design of various interactive in-class sessions. With the mutual class="feedback">feedback class="relationship">relationship class="between">between students and teachers, the quality of teaching class="would">would become class="better">better and class="better">better. In comparison, class="other">other teachers class="do">do not participate in the class="classroom">classroom and consequently could not class="give">give practical advice. For instance, I remember class="when">when I was in college, Mike, a professor teaching America literature caught up a cold during a teaching evaluation public class. As a consequence of class="that">that, he got a score did not match his abilities, which shows the impractical evaluations made by class="other">other teachers.
class="MsoNormal">
class="MsoNormal">furthermore, students’ evaluations are more objective. one the one hand, the number of students class="is">is much more than class="that">that of schoolteachers. As class="is">is often the case, the evaluation data based on a class with 30 students are much more reliable than the data from several evaluation staffs. one the class="other">other hand, there are no interest conflicts class="between">between students and teacher. Taking my own university as an example: students are always required to class="give">give teachers’ teaching evaluations online before students class="can">can view their grades. Therefore, students made evaluations without the affect of score, which seems to be more objective. On the contrary, teachers' evaluations are influenced by colleague relationships, which often mixes with their personal feelings.
class="MsoNormal">
class="MsoNormal">In short, I class="would">would class="like">like to say class="that">that teachers’ performance evaluations by students are more useful. This class="is">is because students’ evaluations are related to efficient improvement on education quality and class="also">also the impartial assess on teachers’ lesson.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-07 | chelsey | 75 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | osfallatah89 | 60 | view |
- Should Teacher of the Year awards be decided through student evaluations of teachers, or through evaluations by other teachers? Please explain. 75
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities."Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast-food 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
class='MsoNormal'>class='when&...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...e protection of evaluation equality. class='MsoNormal'> class='...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quality. class='MsoNormal'> class='MsoNormal'>The most cri...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...ty. class='MsoNormal'> class='MsoNormal'>The most critical...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...n the improvement of education quality. class='it'>it class='is'>...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n the improvement of education quality. class='it'>it class='is'>...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'classes'?
Suggestion: classes
...cation quality. class='it'>it class='is'>is the class='stude...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...apos;>like class='that'>that. furthermore, they class='also'>also contr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...ss='other'>other teachers. class='MsoNormal'> class='...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eachers. class='MsoNormal'> class='MsoNormal'>furthermore,...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...rs. class='MsoNormal'> class='MsoNormal'>furthermore, stud...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...s' evaluations are more objective. one the one hand, the number of students cl...
^^^
Line 9, column 382, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...he data from several evaluation staffs. one the class='other'>other hand,...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
... mixes with their personal feelings. class='MsoNormal'> class='...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eelings. class='MsoNormal'> class='MsoNormal'>In short, I ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...gs. class='MsoNormal'> class='MsoNormal'>In short, I class...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in short, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3319.0 1977.66487455 168% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 9.06830601093 4.8611393121 187% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 8.95449901693 2.67179642975 335% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530054644809 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 947.7 618.680645161 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.6 1.51630824373 171% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0587892964 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.684210526 100.406767564 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2631578947 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 16.0 5.5376344086 289% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0665300895332 0.236089414692 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599518788447 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425756222454 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0459442001519 0.150856017488 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495886487894 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.9 11.7677419355 263% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -32.41 58.1214874552 -56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.10430107527 239% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.5 10.1575268817 222% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 35.33 10.9000537634 324% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 10.002688172 165% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.