Should young people try different jobs before they decide on their long-term job or career?
Before stepping into the workforce, school graduates are filled with endless curiosities about their new stage of life. In many cases, uncertainties exist in their minds. The lack of working experience makes it difficult for them to make a good decision about long-term job choices. Some of them are at a loss, not knowing which professional field really suits their abilities and interests. Consequently, it is definitely advisable for young people to try different jobs before they make a final decision.
To begin with, the accumulation of working experience is critical to a person's perspective about their career. Taking up diversified positions in different companies helps young people learn many valuable skills that cannot be learned from textbooks. Experience definitely makes one mature and more capable. What's more, each company has its unique cultural atmosphere that helps improve one's overall outlook. Young people could take advantage of every job opportunity to accumulate these precious values and this knowledge for their future utilization. Expanding their circle of friends from different job experiences is also of great benefit. No one could deny that interacting with more people paves the way to success.
Furthermore, in the face of uncertainties, practice is the only criterion for testing truth. It just resembles buying shoes at a store. The best way to judge which pair suits a buyer is to let them try on different shoes until they find the right pair. The same is true with job hunting. Young people are mostly suffering from doubts about which job suits them best. An effective way dealing with uncertainties is to try working in different companies.
However, overly frequent changes of employment might lead to an unfavorable impact on one's career. Young job hunters should be reminded of some potential defects. For example, future employers might judge them and regard them as the type of person who could never devote wholeheartedly to the company. They will also question the reasons for leaving one job after another. Honesty and skillful speaking techniques could be useful at this time.
Undeniably, when the moment arrives for a young person to join in the fierce competitions of the job market, making a careful decision is meaningful to their professional life. Needless to say, it is exceedingly fortunate to encounter a most suitable job opportunity in the first instance. As for those who are still suffering from uncertainties, engaging in different jobs might be valuable and applicable stepping stones toward a brilliant future.
- Is it more important to work quickly with risks making mistakes than to work slowly with everything correct? 76
- Is relating well to others more important than studying hard? 76
- Does playing sports teach us about life? 90
- Shouldn t people pay for public transportation 95
- Are some scientists responsible for the negative impacts made by their discoveries 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... of working experience is critical to a persons perspective about their career. Taking ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...tely makes one mature and more capable. Whats more, each company has its unique cultu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, really, so, still, as for, for example, in many cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30656934307 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83296531632 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557177615572 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0537203961 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8846153846 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8076923077 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88461538462 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376370681526 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932161541028 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840069734355 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202914894853 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556060196673 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.