smoking in work place
Cigarette is one of the worst things has made by humans. Each year it kills so many people and there is not even a proved positive effect about smoking. But, some people are highly addicted to it and cannot concentrate on their work if they do not smoke during their work. Some people say that employers must provide some places for smoking, on the other hand, some people are against it. In my view, smoking can really kill and employers should not let their employees smoke during their work. Here is two of my reasons for holding this idea.
First, smoking kills. Each time we turn the television or radio on, we hear about bad effects of smoking on health. We are all aware of the deep connection between smoking and lots of cancers. If we let people to smoke while they are doing their work, we will let them to ignore all bad effects of cigarette easily. But, if we prohibit the employees of smoking, they may have more time and chance to really think about bad effects of Cigarette. In addition, providing some areas for smoking will lead to increase in the number of people who smoke and can even may encourage non-smoker people to smoke. Last year I get hired in a big company, they had a room for smoking and employees could easily go there and smoke. I saw how easily the number of people who smoke increased each month; finally, when the number of smoker employees showed a notable increase, the chief manager of the company prohibited the smoking and some people who had just started to smoke did not continue it anymore.
Second, smoking in work place increases the level of chemical elements in the environment. It is crystal clear that smoking rooms are one of the dirtiest and polluted places and can lead to lots of problems. One of these problem is increase of chemical elements in the work environment. Some global standard institutions like ISO has composed some rules about the maximum allowed level of chemical elements in work environments, and those places which have smoking room, have higher level of chemical elements compared to standard range. This amount of chemical elements can lead to decrease of employees
‘s health which will cost a lot for company to pay for their treatment and hospital costs too.
To cut the long story short, all I want to say is that, some people like to smoke, because they believe smoking can make them calm, and help them to work better. On the other hand, we have so many researches on the effects of smoking on decrease of life quality which will lead to decrease in the quality of work too. In my view, no matter how many people think smoking can help them. They are all wrong and we must help them to change their mind in this regard. Prohibiting of smoking in work places is one of the things we can do and by not providing smoking areas we can give them this chance to think more wisely about bad effects of smoking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-19 | foroozan | 70 | view |
| 2018-06-07 | nastaran1992 | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-15 | Taniazehra | 90 | view |
- celebrities 3
- Do you agree or disagree? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- three beliefs on elephants and some information about them 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...nd can lead to lots of problems. One of these problem is increase of chemical elements in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, really, second, so, while, as for, in addition, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2382.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 520.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58076923077 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26371885996 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.413461538462 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9306188231 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45833333333 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409194939446 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140941660484 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112949703309 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23060251481 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117624998219 0.0645574589148 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.