do you agree or disagree to ban smoking in public places?

Essay topics:

do you agree or disagree to ban smoking in public places?

Nowadays, people are more susceptible to respiratory diseases due to an increase in air pollution; also, some people have an allergy to smoke and the nicotine in cigarettes, it is obvious that exposing to smoking intense their disease. Today, using public transportation systems and presenting in public places is part of people's daily lives. Therefore, I strongly believe that it is a required rule for all societies for some reason, two of which I will elucidate in the below paragraphs.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is rooted in the fact that smoking is not an acceptable and positive habit. Smoking has harmful impacts not only on smokers but also on other people who breathe in the air in which another body is smoking. A noteworthy study, which was conducted in my country some years ago, shows that the emitted substances from smoking affect people who are closer than 1000 meters to the source of smoke; moreover, its influence on these people is not less than its influence on the smoker. The researchers emphasized that its effects are tenfold higher on children. Vividly, we can not prevent children from going to parks, cinemas or using the buses and subway. Besides, Banning smoking makes it more convenient for respiratory and allergic patients to commute public places without any worry about their disease. Hence, I contend that it is necessary to ban smoking in these places for protecting society's health.

The second noteworthy reason is that allowing smoking in public places can escalate the danger of smoking among people because some behaviors like smoking are epidemic especially among friends and teenagers who are at a critical age. As parents can not control their children everywhere; and, most teenagers are not enough mature to reject smoking; in public places, it can be available and affordable for them. But, if it was forbidden in public places, it was not accessible easily; so, it can lead to controlling the spread of smoking. For instance, when I was a university student, the university banned smoking in the first three years; but, in the fourth year, new dean allowed smoking in the cafeteria and some other places. It had a serious effect on most students, most of my friends started smoking just as a hobby; but, after some months they could not quit that; so, many students sued about this new rule; but, they just could forbid it in cafeteria, not other places.

To sum up, all the abovementioned reasons lead us to conclude that it is a valid rule that can have a dramatic effect on each society. It can play a remarkable role in increasing the health of a society; also, it can stop the increase in smoking.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-13 jimHsu 76 view
2023-12-07 butterflyluo 80 view
2023-12-07 butterflyluo 66 view
2023-12-07 butterflyluo 66 view
2023-09-10 tedyang777 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 948, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... places for protecting societys health. The second noteworthy reason is that all...
^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...top the increase in smoking.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, as for, for instance, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92511013216 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60573338893 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519823788546 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.204745404 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.529411765 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7058823529 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200534590713 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706145207685 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707690836839 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114674057741 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698114349208 0.0645574589148 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.