Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends. Some people believe that this policy is great, others believe that this this policy will discourage employees. What is your opinion and why?
There has always been a common dilemma about the time you should spend on your job for decades. Many believe that we can count on weekends if we are behind the schedule in our job. Others, however, are opposed to this idea. I personally hold that we should not delay our work for the holidays.
The first and foremost reason that comes to mind is job burnout. Nowadays, job burnout is prevailing among employees due to the stressful world. Job burnout refers to a lack of energy and mental exhaustion affecting your function. Moreover, it makes you not enjoy your work, while at least a third of our day is being spent in the workplace. With respect to the provided points, one of the solutions to protect ourselves from this phenomenon is taking off. You should force yourself and even your colleagues to stop working on holidays. Although, from the employers' point of view, the outstanding employee is the one going beyond her duty, working too much can produce adverse effects. However, there are some studies suggesting that because of the strain placed on staff in the modern era, you might not have this opportunity to have a break literally, hence, when you are on holiday, your approach should not be avoiding some tasks such as not checking your email. It is recommended that you take a goal approach such as going on a picnic or doing an activity you have been looking for it.
Second, you should not forget that our life is not peculiar to the profession. One aspect of that is family which is of great importance. We all admit that one of our demands is producing and working, but it does not mean that we should neglect the other needs. Human-being is social, so we should allocate enough time to socializing and meeting this crucial demand.
To make a long story short, I wholeheartedly believe in "work hard, play hard". I opine that none of the parts of our life can be a substitute for each other. To put it simply, we ought to spare no effort to strike a balance between career life and personal life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | m.dvd | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | sepehrdsafaee | 76 | view |
- One of the most challenging problems in modern society is to have the most up-to-date skills for the workplace. For solving this, the government decides to give all adults over the age of 25 a training course to learn new skills. Do you think it is an eff 76
- Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends. Some people believe that this policy is great, others believe that this this policy will discourage employees. What is your opinion and why? 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, third, while, at least, such as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64819944598 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48846603863 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573407202216 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9565167626 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134067363794 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374101058347 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422220896339 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722396691801 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346009289554 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.