Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends. Some people believe that this policy is great, others believe that this policy will discourage employees. What is your opinion and why?
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that nowadays earning money has raised the penchant of the people to work hard even on weekends. Because most of the businesses need communication to be done, sending emails or messages are prevailing among businessmen. Although it leads them to be enthusiastic to earn more money, it has some negative and irreversible consequences in addition. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most discernible problems.
The first and probably foremost important reason to be mentioned here is that nowadays, in this hectic life, people are seeking free space to relieve their stresses which are accumulated by working hard during weekdays. They can hang out with their friends or spend their time with their families. However, if they spend their time to do their businesses, they would not able to release their tensions and consequently, they will stay tired during the next weekdays which leads to decreasing efficiency. To shed light on this matter, I would like to mention an example of my own personal experience. When I started to work, I compelled to work during weekends too. After a while, since I had no opportunity to make myself relaxed, I quit the job.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that by doing this, they have no longer tend to accompany their families on weekends and the fissure among them becomes gradually bigger. Indeed, studies have shown that two-thirds of individuals who spend their weekdays doing their businesses are prone to get divorced. Indeed, they sacrifice their own families to earn more money or to promote in the company in which they are working. So in my point of view, companies have to enact strict rules for this issue for its significant negative consequenses on families.
All in all, I firmly believe that companies should ratify distinct regulations for this issue, because of decreasing the rate of efficiency among their employees, as well as the mental issues and increasing the number of divorces among employees’ families.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | m.dvd | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | sepehrdsafaee | 76 | view |
- University students are often encouraged to study fields in which significant job growth a large increase in job opportunities is expected these fields currently include science technology engineering and math do you believe students should consider study 87
- University students are often encouraged to study fields in which significant job growth (a large increase in job opportunities) is expected; these fields currently include science, technology, engineering, and math, do you believe students should conside 84
- Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends. Some people believe that this policy is great, others believe that this policy will discourage employees. What is your opinion and why? 76
- Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view 76
- Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists tha 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, third, thus, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08235294118 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76791272089 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2303200141 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.2 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142817992972 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458858449481 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362453261352 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925687342702 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306959121194 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.