Some local languages are becoming extinct. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In this globalisation era, various languages are persistently becoming extinct. In this regard, some people consider that this would promote more harmony among people, while on the other hand, some negate this notion. This particular argument is a two-sided sword as it has both positive and negative aspects.
To begin with, if a few languages were used to communicate, people would feel more connected to each other. Also, they would be able to communicate better and resolve various political issues, which in turn would promote unity among them. In addition to this, there would indeed be greater chances of learning them. Hence, it would make it easier for us to explore various different places as well as widen our knowledge of various different fields like culture, education, and the trade sector. For instance, with English being developed as an international language, we are able to visit all around the world and communicate and study various subjects in English.
Contrariwise, with several different languages dying every year, people believe that we are losing the uniqueness and individuality of cultures. Culture, no doubt, is linked to local languages. With diminishing languages, rich culture is also being eradicated alongside. This culture includes various stories or songs, and with the elimination of a language, the culture and heritage associated with it are also lost. Moreover, this practice can develop inferiority complexes among members of that community.
By analysing both aspects of this situation, I concur that even though a uniform language provides peace, the rich heritage and culture associated with language cannot be compromised. It would be more advantageous if our society possess a diversity of cultures and traditions. We all should make collective efforts to preserve these superseding languages and make our world more interesting and multi-faceted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-13 | Anurag96 | 76 | view |
| 2022-07-14 | ojehparvaz | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | mattayousak | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | Feragafor. | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | KEVA | 11 | view |
- Ethanol as an alternative to petroleum 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because today s world is so busy and crowded we should not expect people to be polite to one another 83
- People should keep trying to reach their goals even if they seem impossible to achieve 73
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism ab 80
- Altruism 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...ubjects in English. Contrariwise, with several different languages dying every year, people beli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, no doubt, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48639455782 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88004467304 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4983682416 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8125 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202817474631 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070545193929 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756184856208 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139085150438 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120066853765 0.0645574589148 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.