Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that offering unusual and out of law money to schools not only is out of ethics but also led to damage in educational quality of schools in a long time. Contrary, to this popular beliefs there are still those who argue that proposing money to the schools work as a motivation factor for school managers and teachers for higher and hard attempts for improving the quality of education and more precise attention to the students. I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that offering money to the schools for the higher grade or any other aims is a good idea.
First and foremost, surely, all of the parents have not ability or interest to pay this money to the schools some this happens to create the difference between students who pay extra money to the school and who do not pay this money. Because it is possible that teachers and school staff have some different behavior or extra educational program just for students that their parents pay money. This work certainly threatened the educational justice for students because all of them should have equal time and practice in the school.
On another significant fact, that should be taken into the consideration is that this kind of works (pay money) can increase the possibility of crime in the schools because create a way for parents who want their children getting the good grade in the school under each condition to guarantee the success of their children future. For example, a school manager who is not very persis to laws take money for ensuring parents for a good grade even through cheating.
Finally, yet importantly, if this work becomes extended to all of the schools this condition provide serious pressure on parents who have not enough funding to support this money to the schools and it can be a big threaten for social justice of our children. Because of our educational system based on the goal of free education for all of the people and providing the opportunity of success for all of the children in the society separate from their wealthy. In the end, I think this work in the long term can be decreased future development of our society by doing jobs by crazy and not talented people.
On the bases of the reason that mentioned above, I am convinced that offering money to the schools for good grad is a huge mistake because of the decrease in educational justice and rising the possibility of crime and out of law working and also destructive a lot of talented students.
- Buying a Franchise. Franchise benefits. 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 45 66
- TPO 20 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 29, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...good idea. First and foremost, surely, all of the parents have not ability or interest to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...antly, if this work becomes extended to all of the schools this condition provide serious ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...based on the goal of free education for all of the people and providing the opportunity of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 397, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...roviding the opportunity of success for all of the children in the society separate from t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, so, still, for example, i think, kind of, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71788990826 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50304397632 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44495412844 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.1344086022 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.9928949108 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.416666667 100.406767564 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.3333333333 20.6045352989 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379988019965 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167144686951 0.076458572812 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675257266136 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229180652778 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633821773215 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.0537634409 163% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.