Some people believe that sharing good times with friends could make friendship stronger. Others think sharing problems with their friends and talking about problems could make their friendship stronger.
Which one do you agree with?
With the swift development of cutting-edge technology and science, the Internet emerges and prevails in people’s daily life, which means that people’s social zone will expand more and more significant. How to maintain the relationship between person and person is the problem that everyone must face. However, only use social media’s chat room to chat on the Internet can’t build sturdy friendship. In my opinion, the most important factor to strength friendship is grappling with some thorny dilemmas with our friends.
First and foremost, helping our friends to wrestle with some plights is the best way to structure firm friendship. “Trust and understanding are the basic and catalyst of all love, affection and friendship”, how often we hear such words like there. That is, trust can lay a solid foundation for friendship. If we and our friends didn’t build any foundation of trust, we wouldn’t grip any real emotion from our friends. Thus, the stable friendship needs we and friends to discuss, to think, to solve anything we facing in our daily.
In addition, sometime we may meet some arguments when we handle some quandaries together, but in this circumstance which we make our relationship tighter and better. In the most of conditions, people can understand thoughts from different people, which is always due to controversy. Meanwhile, the knot between we and friends also need some quarrel to realize the difference of our thoughts, and tolerate them to increase our compainionship. Therefore, it is conducive to fellowship that via the fight to know each other better, such as habits, thinkings…etc.
Admittedly, sharing well things and good time are also able to fast build the compainionship with other people. It make other people easily know us from some funny things in the comfortable zone. However, it can’t structure the connection more concrete and tighter.
To conclude, considering that we are capable of coping with lots of predicaments, which make us to discuss, to argue, then realize each other and enhance the friendship. I am staunchly convinced that facing the dilemmas together will make the fellowship stronger.
- Some people believe that sharing good times with friends could make friendship stronger Others think sharing problems with their friends and talking about problems could make their friendship stronger Which one do you agree with 77
- For sucess in school and work the ability to adapt or adjust to a changing condition or circumstance is more important than have in excellent knowledge of a job or a field of study Do you agree or disageee 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the conditions') or simply say ''most conditions''.
Suggestion: most of the conditions; most conditions
...relationship tighter and better. In the most of conditions, people can understand thoughts from di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...he compainionship with other people. It make other people easily know us from some f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31594202899 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94736290947 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56231884058 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6455891337 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271355993058 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812295660748 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551728512808 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153096835483 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358228139554 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the conditions') or simply say ''most conditions''.
Suggestion: most of the conditions; most conditions
...relationship tighter and better. In the most of conditions, people can understand thoughts from di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...he compainionship with other people. It make other people easily know us from some f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31594202899 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94736290947 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56231884058 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6455891337 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271355993058 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812295660748 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551728512808 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153096835483 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358228139554 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.