Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to schoolwork. Which of the two approaches do you prefer?
Nowadays, people are busy in their work and daily life. So, it is rare for them to have time spending with their children. It goes without saying that parents have to use their little time with their sons and daughters. While some people say that parents should spend that time doing something such as homework together, I believe it can be devoted to having fun, playing games, and so forth. In what follows, I will give some reasons and substantiate them.
First of all and foremost, parents must spend time with their children to playing game os sports because they are best friends of them to play. Young people play every day, and most of their time is spent on games. Most of these games should be played with more than one person. So, they have to find a partner to play. Who is the better person than parents? It is crystal clear that no one is better than the father and mother. For example, when a child plays soccer in their yard, if he plays with his friend who is their neighbor's son, it will be dangerous for him to have an injury during the play. But, if he plays with his parents, they will try to protect him from damage. Therefore, children can spend their time with their parents to play or fun.
Secondly, parents can improve their relation related to their feelings and emotions with their children by playing with them. For instance, a son thinks his father is the bravest person in the world. When he plays with his father, it raises this feeling in their mind. Thus, in the future, he can do his duty in a hard situation because he thinks his father can help him to do this, and this affects his attitude. Likewise, parents can spend their free moments with their sons and daughters to promote their emotional relations with them.
To conclude, not only can playing with children protect the children from injury, but it can also raise parents relation related to their emotions with children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | 3dra | 63 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | mucahit11 | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 70
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- glass, birds, harm, injury, One-Way Glass, Colorful DesignT Magnetic Field 85
- bee, Arizona, flowering plants, actual bees fossils, nest chambers 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57391304348 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.11643829797 2.67179642975 79% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489855072464 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8892469041 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400789276515 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139036140122 0.076458572812 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102697350559 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260941778691 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110801636155 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 58.1214874552 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.