Some people prefer to go and visit the tourist attractions
where there are many people. Others like the ones with
fewer people. Which one do you prefer?
Tourist spots are the most common places worldwide to travel. In this connection, opinions are divided into whether the more crowded spots are more preferable to visit or the quiet ones. Personally, it is my firm conviction that tourist attraction where more people visit have more edges over places with a few numbers of visitors. Stating in the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my standpoint through two conspicuous reasons.
The first worthwhile reason to support my stance is that crowded tourist spots provide visitors with far more security. To put it in the other words, being around other social members give us a sense of security that if anything happens there is someone to ask for help. My personal experience of staying a night at Gravan is a piece of strong evidence to further illustrate this matter. Two years before now, I traveled to a tourist spot named Gravan that has a fascinating spring with a pour natural landscape. Unfortunately, I arrived there late so, I had to set up my tent there staying there the night. In the middle of the night, wolves started howling that scared me since it was my first time hearing a wolf's howl in reality. Fortunately, some other tourists were there that helped me to hold up facing my fear otherwise I had to leave, which was even more dangerous. Under no circumstances could I spend the night enjoying the starry sky if there was no person.
The second noteworthy point to endorse my outlook is that tourist attractions serve tourists with more accessible facilities. As a matter of fact, the more people visit a place, the more facilities will be there thereby staying in these places is more convenient recording more memorable times in tourists' mind. My relevant experience of visiting Oramanat as a heritage culture of Kurdish people is a compelling example of this. Last year, with some of my close friends, I went to a village named Palngan where is known for its step-style architecture in which every houses' roof is the yard of the upper house. There were some tourist-houses with local architecture that We rented one and spend two nights there. By and large, such experience of rural lifestyle depicted such a memory in our mind never forgotten. Had never lots of tourists visited there, the local people would not have dedicated some houses for visitors. Hence, no memorable experience of living in rural areas.
To wrap up what has been discussed, I profoundly believe that crowded tourist spots are a far better option to visit compared with deserted ones. This is because they not only do provide more security but also serve visitors with more facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-06 | yasaman-pooshidani | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-06 | yasaman-pooshidani | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | saamaan | 83 | view |
| 2021-01-04 | Maedeee | 76 | view |
| 2020-11-17 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 76 | view |
- People think that increasing the use of computers and mobiles has a negative effect on young people s writing and reading skill Do you agree or disagree 73
- teachers should not make their social or political views known in the classrooms Do you agree or disagree 76
- The yellow crazy ant is one of the world s most destructive invasive species species that are not native to an area but rather introduced to it It has spread to many regions of Earth and caused great damage to native ecosystems In recent decades the crazy 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Televisions have more negative effects on young people rather than positive effects to behave 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for the job would be more satisfying 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...avan that has a fascinating spring with a pour natural landscape. Unfortunately, I arr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, second, so, while, as a matter of fact, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88864142539 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66316446694 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543429844098 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.924595042 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7727272727 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4090909091 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95454545455 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222756008635 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610902377341 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563417191004 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133386146407 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619591357949 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.