Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
According to the passage, airships were once widely used but nowadays airplanes have taken over them. Considering this fact, the writer puts forward several solutions for airships to retake their place in transportation. However, the speaker finds all of them impractical and refits them vividly.
First and foremost, the article asserts that for vertical lifts, balloons can be used soas to airships only use engines for horizontal moving while airplanes only use engines for either vertical or horizontal moving. Thereby, airships combustion less fuel. On the other hand, the professor points out that balloons use lighter gases, hydrogen and helium, both of which have serious drawbacks. Hydrogen is capable of firing easily and bringing about tragic accidents, and Helium not only is difficult to obtain but also less powerful. As a result, airships using this solution will not assure safety and affordability.
Secondly, the reading passage mentions airships' ability to reach hard locations because they do not require a lot of space to land or take off. Besides they are able to carry heavier loads than for example helicopters. Conversely, the lecture reveals the fact that balloons move slowly and their movement should be kept steady to avoid trees and crashing. In this case, keeping balloons steady in high altitudes where is windy is a tough problem to tackle.
Lastly, the passage claims that airships are able to replace satellites for communication since they burn less fuel during their mission. On the contrary, the professor clears out that balloons reach only altitudes as high as 40 km in which strong winds cause balloons to use up their fuel, hence landing to refuel resulting in not providing the expected continuous and uninterrupted service satellites provide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-14 | Cheese in Alaska | 70 | view |
| 2024-01-12 | saamaan | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 3 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | nusah | 68 | view |
- The opinions of celebrities are more important to young people than they are to older people Do you agree or disagree 90
- On a recent New Year s Day residents of a North American town awoke to discover that thousands of birds had died the night before and that their bodies were lying in open spaces and in the roads The dead birds had apparently fallen out of the sky during t 83
- People think that increasing the use of computers and mobiles has a negative effect on young people s writing and reading skill Do you agree or disagree 73
- In recent years wind energy as a source of renewable and clear energy has become increasingly popular Unfortunately wind energy has one significant environmental drawback fast moving turbine blades pose serious threats to birds flying through wind farms V 81
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement some people believe that correcting a mistake made by a teacher or a meeting leader right away is not appropriate 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...ire a lot of space to land or take off. Besides they are able to carry heavier loads th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30281690141 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61460200074 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62676056338 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6822754229 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06452816374 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0662313758837 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0231155652575 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317299585849 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0417453244567 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405050296056 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.