Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In today’s progressive world, each individual with different range age can express the positive impact of internet on their life. With no doubt, development of technology and internet create the variety ways to find all the knowledge and make the opportunity to expand your visuality, imagination, solutions and your skills. However, most of the psychologist had believed that being aware of something might have negative influence on people. They might have gain some inappropriate knowledge from the internet that should lead them to bad habitat and behavior. I am of the opinion of that, attaining the different of information is the advantage of this modern world and help the lives easier. The reasons to support my idea are illustrated in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, all the people are required to buy staff based on their demands. Therefore, they should decide the better choice among the lot of production. But how they can do it? How they can compare the items in the pool of market? In this regard, internet invent a widespread view in front of them to assist them in this way. For instance, when I needed the new cellphone last year and I should determine which phone was good enough for in use, I searched in the internet and could obtain more information. So under this situation, selecting the best item had been very convenient and it is a benefit of internet to build a safe buying.
Furthermore, traveling in all over the world is an important activity recently. Consequently knowing information about the cities or countries where you might go there, are being criticized recently. Although, the people who had lived in the past just took the trip to the places where they were familiar with, nowadays people can travel anywhere with using the internet. As a result, they can recognize unknown places on the internet and can experience more. Also, the map direction do not let you lost in unfamiliar locations so you can move safely.
In conclusion, having considered the above-mentioned reasons into account, that information availability on the internet can direct the lives to be improved in future and now. We should think about this, how the lack of information had influenced in the life standard in past and made the blind world.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...orld is an important activity recently. Consequently knowing information about the cities or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97900262467 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77746348826 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58530183727 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4504315284 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.85 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.05 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230249968487 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059034010968 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454921437839 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133516400512 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250949404754 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.